public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakob Østergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Chris Friesen <chris_friesen@sympatico.ca>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: software raid issues -- possible kernel I/O problem?
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 20:19:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011209201900.A8549@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C11358D.28400117@sympatico.ca> <3C114539.62A0D8E7@sympatico.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3C114539.62A0D8E7@sympatico.ca>; from chris_friesen@sympatico.ca on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 05:39:53PM -0500

On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 05:39:53PM -0500, Chris Friesen wrote:
> 
> A number of people have privately pointed out that hdparm -T doesn't
> actually go to the disk at all.  Guess I should RTFM...I though that
> this was reading from the disk's cache, not linux's cache.  Oops.
> 
> I'm still kind of curious why raid-1 reads don't seem to get any
> performance increase over reads from a single disk.  Any ideas?

For one single large sequential read, the current RAID-1 code will
not show any significant benefit over the single-disk case.

However, if you read many smaller files, or have multiple concurrent
readers, you should see a good speedup.

Try running two bonnies at the same time.

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:

  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-09 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-07 21:33 software raid issues -- possible kernel I/O problem? Chris Friesen
2001-12-07 22:39 ` Chris Friesen
2001-12-09 19:19   ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
2001-12-09 19:32 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011209201900.A8549@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=chris_friesen@sympatico.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox