From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:43:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:43:45 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:14351 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:43:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:43:34 +0000 From: Russell King To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: NFS woes in 2.5.1-pre8 Message-ID: <20011212164334.B16377@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm not sure if this is expected or not, but I'm seeing odd behaviour with NFS on 2.5.1-pre8: [root@assabet bin]$vdir ../lib -rwxr-xr-x 1 51 51 29091 Dec 12 2001 libts-0.0.so.0.0.0 ../lib: Input/output error [root@assabet bin]$uname -a Linux assabet 2.5.1-pre8 #69 Mon Dec 10 22:21:15 GMT 2001 armv4l unknown [root@assabet bin]$ Looking at the NFS traffic: 16:27:09.051301 assabet.arm.linux.org.uk.33f11c24 > raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk.nfs: 148 lookup fh Unknown/1 "libts-0.0.so.0" (DF) 16:27:09.061306 raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk.nfs > assabet.arm.linux.org.uk.33f11c24: reply ok 128 lookup fh Unknown/1 (DF) Admittedly raistlin is running a rather old, obsolete NFS server, which has up until now worked faultlessly for around 2 years: Universal NFS Server 2.2beta48 Appologies, but I'm not sure how I got it into this state either - last thing I had done was to overwrite the files in ../lib and bin with new sets on the NFS server. The only directory that is suffering is ../lib. (there's bin and ../include as well, both of which would've had their files overwritten with later versions). -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html