From: Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net>
To: "Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado" <raul@viadomus.com>, rml@tech9.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is /dev/shm needed?
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:47:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011216234748.3EDE9FB80D@tabris.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16Fkqc-0001Z0-00@DervishD.viadomus.com>
In-Reply-To: <E16Fkqc-0001Z0-00@DervishD.viadomus.com>
On Sunday 16 December 2001 18:37, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
> Hello Adam :))
>
> >> have lots of memory to spare, give it a try. Mount /tmp or all of /var
> >> in tmpfs.
> >
> >Unfortunately, some(many?) distros are b0rken in re /var/. There is
> >stuff put there that is needed across boots (for example, mandrake
> >puts the DNS master files in /var/named.)
Thank you for this correction of my understanding of /var
I now am under the impression that it merely means that /var must be mounted
rw. It is for variables, but not discardable data.
This still means that the concept of a tmpfs /var is _severely_ broken. DON'T
DO IT.
I may be wrong about /tmp as well, but I have come to think that it is data
that ought be discarded after logout, and have sometimes considered writing a
script for it in the login/logout scripts.
>
> Moreover, didn't the LHS say that /var/tmp is supposed to be
> maintained across reboots? I'm not sure about this, but anyway /var
> is supposed to hold temporary data, not boot-throwable data, isn't
> it?
>
> Raúl
--
tabris
Once I swore I would die for you, but I never meant like this.
Shame, by Stabbing Westward
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-16 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-16 23:37 Is /dev/shm needed? RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 23:47 ` Adam Schrotenboer [this message]
2001-12-16 23:56 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-12-17 0:17 ` Adam Schrotenboer
2001-12-17 2:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-12-17 15:50 ` Luigi Genoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-17 8:41 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-17 8:34 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-12-17 4:14 Jason Rivard
2001-12-16 23:36 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 23:15 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 23:12 ` Robert Love
2001-12-16 23:31 ` Pierfrancesco Caci
2001-12-17 8:36 ` ncw
2001-12-17 8:19 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-12-16 22:02 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 22:30 ` Robert Love
2001-12-16 23:13 ` Adam Schrotenboer
2001-12-16 23:26 ` J Sloan
2001-12-16 23:27 ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-17 9:03 ` Jurgen Botz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011216234748.3EDE9FB80D@tabris.net \
--to=adam@tabris.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raul@viadomus.com \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox