public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Schrotenboer <adam@tabris.net>
To: "Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado" <raul@viadomus.com>, rml@tech9.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is /dev/shm needed?
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:47:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011216234748.3EDE9FB80D@tabris.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16Fkqc-0001Z0-00@DervishD.viadomus.com>
In-Reply-To: <E16Fkqc-0001Z0-00@DervishD.viadomus.com>

On Sunday 16 December 2001 18:37, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote:
>     Hello Adam :))
>
> >> have lots of memory to spare, give it a try.  Mount /tmp or all of /var
> >> in tmpfs.
> >
> >Unfortunately, some(many?) distros are b0rken in re /var/. There is
> >stuff put there that is needed across boots (for example, mandrake
> >puts the DNS master files in /var/named.)

Thank you for this correction of my understanding of /var
I now am under the impression that it merely means that /var must be mounted 
rw. It is for variables, but not discardable data.

This still means that the concept of a tmpfs /var is _severely_ broken. DON'T 
DO IT.

I may be wrong about /tmp as well, but I have come to think that it is data 
that ought be discarded after logout, and have sometimes considered writing a 
script for it in the login/logout scripts.

>
>     Moreover, didn't the LHS say that /var/tmp is supposed to be
> maintained across reboots? I'm not sure about this, but anyway /var
> is supposed to hold temporary data, not boot-throwable data, isn't
> it?
>
>     Raúl

-- 
tabris

   Once I swore I would die for you, but I never meant like this.

                                              Shame, by Stabbing Westward


  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-16 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-16 23:37 Is /dev/shm needed? RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 23:47 ` Adam Schrotenboer [this message]
2001-12-16 23:56   ` Ryan Cumming
2001-12-17  0:17     ` Adam Schrotenboer
2001-12-17  2:26     ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-12-17 15:50 ` Luigi Genoni
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-17  8:41 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-17  8:34 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-12-17  4:14 Jason Rivard
2001-12-16 23:36 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 23:15 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 23:12 ` Robert Love
2001-12-16 23:31   ` Pierfrancesco Caci
2001-12-17  8:36     ` ncw
2001-12-17  8:19 ` Christoph Rohland
2001-12-16 22:02 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-12-16 22:30 ` Robert Love
2001-12-16 23:13   ` Adam Schrotenboer
2001-12-16 23:26     ` J Sloan
2001-12-16 23:27   ` Alexander Viro
2001-12-17  9:03     ` Jurgen Botz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011216234748.3EDE9FB80D@tabris.net \
    --to=adam@tabris.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raul@viadomus.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox