From: Whit Blauvelt <whit@transpect.com>
To: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops - 2.4.17rc1
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:34:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011217133433.C2116@free.transpect.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011215005641.A810@china.patternbook.com> <3C1AEFB7.119D8902@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C1AEFB7.119D8902@pobox.com>; from jjs@pobox.com on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:37:43PM -0800
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:37:43PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> iptables is already in the kernel, so an iptables
> patch does sound experimental, e.g. you are
> adding something new -
>
> BTW 2.4.6 doesn't sound right for an iptables
> version -
Right! Got to stop typing late at night. Presumably iptables 1.2.4 make does
not add anything new to the kernel, but just builds the utilities agains it?
In anycase, nothing experimental was specified. Or is the kernel including
previous iptables code?
Whit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-17 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-15 5:56 Oops - 2.4.17rc1 (with iptables 2.4.6) Whit Blauvelt
2001-12-15 9:02 ` Edward Killips
[not found] ` <1008396931.17483.0.camel@psuedomode>
2001-12-17 18:29 ` Oops - 2.4.17rc1 Whit Blauvelt
[not found] ` <3C1AEFB7.119D8902@pobox.com>
2001-12-17 18:34 ` Whit Blauvelt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011217133433.C2116@free.transpect.com \
--to=whit@transpect.com \
--cc=jjs@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox