From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: acme@conectiva.com.br
Cc: SteveW@ACM.org, jschlst@samba.org, ncorbic@sangoma.com,
eis@baty.hanse.de, dag@brattli.net, torvalds@transmeta.com,
marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:08:09 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011218.130809.22018359.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011218185200.A1211@conectiva.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <20011218033552.B910@conectiva.com.br> <20011217.225134.91313099.davem@redhat.com> <20011218185200.A1211@conectiva.com.br>
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:52:00 -0200
Em Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:51:34PM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu:
> Which brings me to...
>
> Please let me know if this is something acceptable for 2.5.
>
> What kind of before/after effect do you see in lat_tcp/lat_connect
> (from lmbench) runs?
Improvements on the lat_connect case? :)
Great. I have no fundamental problems with your changes.
Now, when/if we move the hash-chain/identity members into
the IPv4 struct (there are some issues with this wrt. ipv6 btw) I will
be interested in seeing the same tests done :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-18 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20011210230810.C896@conectiva.com.br>
[not found] ` <20011210.231826.55509210.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-18 5:35 ` [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[not found] ` <20011217.225134.91313099.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-18 12:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-18 20:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-18 21:08 ` David S. Miller [this message]
[not found] ` <20011218232222.A1963@conectiva.com.br>
2001-12-20 3:23 ` [PATCH][RFC 3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-20 8:21 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-20 12:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-21 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-22 3:28 ` [PATCH][RFC 4] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011218.130809.22018359.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=SteveW@ACM.org \
--cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=dag@brattli.net \
--cc=eis@baty.hanse.de \
--cc=jschlst@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=ncorbic@sangoma.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox