From: Diego Calleja <grundig@teleline.es>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jurgen Botz <jurgen@botz.org>
Subject: Re: Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1!
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:33:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011218003359.A555@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011217025856.A1649@diego> <13425.1008580831@nova.botz.org>
In-Reply-To: <13425.1008580831@nova.botz.org>; from jurgen@botz.org on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:20:31 +0100
Well, I've run badblocks in 2.4.16
results:
root@diego:~# badblocks -n -vv /dev/hdc5
Initializing random test data
Checking for bad blocks in non-destructive read-write mode
>From block 0 to 9671067
Checking for bad blocks (non-destructive read-write test): done
Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found.
root@diego:~#
It takes about 6 hours to check this...but perhaps I should repeat again
in 2.4.17-rc1.
It works in 2.4.16, but ls /hdc5/etc
Dec 18 00:22:32 diego kernel: reiserfs: checking transaction log (device
16:05) ...
Dec 18 00:22:32 diego kernel: Using r5 hash to sort names
Dec 18 00:22:32 diego kernel: ReiserFS version 3.6.25
Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match
to the expected one 1
Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 10667. Fsck?
Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68722 0x0 SD]
Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match
to the expected one 1
Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 10667. Fsck?
Dec 18 00:22:40 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68669 0x0 SD]
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match
to the expected one 1
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 10667. Fsck?
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 64508 0x0 SD]
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match
to the expected one 1
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 10667. Fsck?
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 63049 0x0 SD]
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match
to the expected one 1
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 10667. Fsck?
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68673 0x0 SD]
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: is_tree_node: node level 18771 does not match
to the expected one 1
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-5150: search_by_key: invalid format found
in block 10667. Fsck?
Dec 18 00:22:41 diego kernel: vs-13070: reiserfs_read_inode2: i/o failure
occurred trying to find stat data of [4160 68377 0x0 SD]
This is my opinion:
-Something (reiserfs, anything) has caused fs corruption
-It should be repaired by reiserfsck, but it's broken :-((
-This corruption should NOT have happened, reiserfsck shouldn't
have to be used.
-I'm not a kernel hacker, so I can't try anything...what I know is
that
/etc in hc5 doesn't work. /usr, /var....works correctly.
Well, I'd like to know what's happened in my drive. Can somebody try to
give an explanation?
Diego Calleja
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-17 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-16 17:48 Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1! Diego Calleja
2001-12-16 17:57 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-16 20:12 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2001-12-17 1:58 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-17 21:01 ` Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <13425.1008580831@nova.botz.org>
2001-12-17 23:33 ` Diego Calleja [this message]
2001-12-18 5:01 ` Ross Vandegrift
2001-12-18 6:19 ` Jurgen Botz
2001-12-18 21:45 ` Diego Calleja
[not found] ` <15391.12150.650359.33792@laputa.namesys.com>
[not found] ` <20011218220828.A381@diego>
2001-12-18 21:11 ` [grundig@teleline.es: Re: Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1!] Diego Calleja
2001-12-19 9:18 ` Nikita Danilov
[not found] ` <3C1F3FDA.5050601@namesys.com>
2001-12-18 21:35 ` [reiserfs-list] Re: Reiserfs corruption on 2.4.17-rc1! Diego Calleja
[not found] ` <20011218125852.A1159@namesys.com>
[not found] ` <20011218224848.C377@diego>
[not found] ` <20011219095303.A11409@namesys.com>
2001-12-20 0:20 ` Diego Calleja
[not found] <20011217002350.D418@diego>
2001-12-17 1:45 ` Diego Calleja
2001-12-19 16:56 ` Edward Muller
2001-12-19 22:17 ` Diego Calleja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011218003359.A555@diego \
--to=grundig@teleline.es \
--cc=jurgen@botz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox