From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: SteveW@ACM.org, jschlst@samba.org, ncorbic@sangoma.com,
eis@baty.hanse.de, dag@brattli.net, torvalds@transmeta.com,
marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 3] cleaning up struct sock
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:37:59 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011220103759.A1208@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011218.130809.22018359.davem@redhat.com> <20011218232222.A1963@conectiva.com.br> <20011220012339.A919@conectiva.com.br> <20011220.002126.119272610.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011220.002126.119272610.davem@redhat.com>
Em Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:21:26AM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:23:39 -0200
>
> Available at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/acme/v2.5/2.5.1/
> sock.cleanup-2.5.1.patch.bz2
>
> Looking pretty good. I have one improvement.
>
> I'd rather you pass the "kmem_cache_t" directly into sk_alloc, use
> NULL for "I don't have any extra private area".
humm I did that with sock_register to avoid changing all the sk_alloc
users, but in the end all protocols were changed so... ok, I'll do that, at
least it'll simplify the "rtnetlink socket allocated early in the boot
process before sock_register(rtnetlink) was called".
> And then, for the IP case lay it out like this:
>
> struct sock
> struct ip_opt
> struct {tcp,raw4,...}_opt
>
> And use different kmem_cache_t's for each protocol instead of
> the same one for tcp, raw4, etc.
>
> RAW/UDP sockets waste a lot of space with your current layout.
*grin*
Ok, ok, lets save more bytes 8) I'll look into this.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-20 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20011210230810.C896@conectiva.com.br>
[not found] ` <20011210.231826.55509210.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-18 5:35 ` [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[not found] ` <20011217.225134.91313099.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-18 12:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-18 20:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-18 21:08 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <20011218232222.A1963@conectiva.com.br>
2001-12-20 3:23 ` [PATCH][RFC 3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-20 8:21 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-20 12:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2001-12-21 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-12-22 3:28 ` [PATCH][RFC 4] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011220103759.A1208@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=SteveW@ACM.org \
--cc=dag@brattli.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=eis@baty.hanse.de \
--cc=jschlst@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=ncorbic@sangoma.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox