From: Denis Oliver Kropp <dok@directfb.org>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Total system lockup with Alt-SysRQ-L
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 12:48:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011224114803.GA23494@master.directfb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011223175846.B27993@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <E16IKwX-0002U3-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20011224083752.A1181@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20011224083752.A1181@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Quoting Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk):
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:34:20AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > When pid1 exits (maybe due to a kill signal), we lockup hard in (iirc)
> > > exit_notify. I don't remember the details I'm afraid.
> >
> > pid1 ends up trying to kill pid1 and it goes deeply down the toilet from
> > that point onwards. The Unix traditional world reboots when pid 1 dies.
>
> The problem was definitely in the exit_notify code, where it manipulated
> the task links indefinitely. (I think it was cptr never becomes null,
> so the loop never terminates).
>
> However, if we're saying that "pid1 must not die" then maybe we should get
> rid of the 'killall' sysrq option since it serves no useful purpose, and
> add a suitable panic in the do_exit path?
Another annoying thing that happens sometimes is that I accidently
press 'L' or 'E' instead of 'K' or 'R', the mostly used SysRQs for me.
An additional modifier for the harmful actions would be useful, e.g. Shift.
So pressing Alt-SysRQ-E would do nothing until Shift is pressed, too.
--
Best regards,
Denis Oliver Kropp
.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/ |
"------------------------------------------"
convergence integrated media GmbH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-24 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-23 17:58 Total system lockup with Alt-SysRQ-L Russell King
2001-12-24 2:34 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-24 8:37 ` Russell King
2001-12-24 11:48 ` Denis Oliver Kropp [this message]
2001-12-24 12:26 ` Russell King
2001-12-25 11:33 ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-24 14:27 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-12-24 17:07 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-25 11:35 ` Pavel Machek
2001-12-28 1:00 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011224114803.GA23494@master.directfb.org \
--to=dok@directfb.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox