Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system

Tom Rini
2001-12-30T17:33:33Z

On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> trini@kernel.crashing.org said:
> > > unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE
>
> > Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide?
>
> Eric is merely representing the _existing_ rules. Changing the behaviour
> can come later - that shouldn't be done at the same time as introducing CML2.

Yes, but what I was getting at was that these constraints will change
(either because they were incorrect or no longer aplicable).

Either way, why not fix bugs now? (since there are non-PCI/ISA ide,
which is why I kept that example to start with).

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)