From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,PDS_BAD_THREAD_QP_64,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17304C15500 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0773265054 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232164AbhCEM3R (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:29:17 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:28546 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232142AbhCEM2u (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:28:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1614947329; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SIZLbtAZFPSHx5KKUsWXi2GN4jMwh5B3FLo1HVp/XuA=; b=ARrl+A4NacEJoQDWXFN/jTOax3EpcP22OuWcRHEBIWfDrrG+Wr/GiVIgjqcAn7TbGM9mD8 u/59lfYb6O52NRW/vnzgIkwT0uPrVBPvRuaVVPj7gWjU/NGtsGstM9o54XRkt1nLLmNKbI J8eSPvHe2LiO8bFHbbbouJKTK3uZdvs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-258-wSKFs8qaPzSDUFBiJ11oCQ-1; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:28:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: wSKFs8qaPzSDUFBiJ11oCQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916B283DD20; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67AED10013D6; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail19.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail19.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.22]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129654BB40; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:28:40 -0500 (EST) From: Veronika Kabatova To: Anshuman Khandual Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , James Morse , Robin Murphy , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Dan Williams , David Hildenbrand , Mike Rapoport Message-ID: <2001895867.30197818.1614947320141.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1614921898-4099-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.36.114.98, 10.4.195.5] Thread-Topic: arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory Thread-Index: HYYsJ7UKXk8vnHFKJgWVD82gr9EAgQ== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anshuman Khandual" > To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, l= inux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: "Catalin Marinas" , "Will Deacon" , "Ard Biesheuvel" , > "Mark Rutland" , "James Morse" , "Robin Murphy" , > "J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Glisse" , "Dan Williams" , "David Hildenbrand" > , "Mike Rapoport" , "Veronika Kabat= ova" > Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 6:38:14 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] arm64/mm: Fix pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE bas= ed memory >=20 >=20 > On 3/5/21 10:54 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > This series fixes pfn_valid() for ZONE_DEVICE based memory and also > > improves > > its performance for normal hotplug memory. While here, it also reorgani= zes > > pfn_valid() on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. This series is based on v5.12-rc1. > >=20 > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > > Cc: Mark Rutland > > Cc: James Morse > > Cc: Robin Murphy > > Cc: J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Glisse > > Cc: Dan Williams > > Cc: David Hildenbrand > > Cc: Mike Rapoport > > Cc: Veronika Kabatova > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >=20 > > Changes in V3: > >=20 > > - Validate the pfn before fetching mem_section with __pfn_to_section() = in > > [PATCH 2/2] >=20 > Hello Veronica, >=20 > Could you please help recreate the earlier failure [1] but with this > series applies on v5.12-rc1. Thank you. >=20 Hello Anshuman, the machine in question is currently loaned to a developer. I'll reach out to them and will let you know once I have any results. Veronika > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/cki.8D1CB60FEC.K6NJMEFQPV@redhat= .com/ >=20 > - Anshuman >=20 >=20