Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix

David Weinehall
2002-01-10T10:41:50Z

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 10:03:42AM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:

[snip]

> Of course ordering rules must be obeyed, and side effects cannot be moved
> across sequence points. Thus if the two volatile loads are in separate
> instructions, as in:

[snip]

Sorry, if I'm rude, but is this discussion really going anywhere, and
is it really necessary to have on lkml?! The signal/noise-ratio is low
enough as it is.

Instead of arguing about possible interpretations of the C-standard, why
not do some real C-programming instead...

Regards: David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </