From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: harald.holzer@eunet.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wookie@osdl.org, velco@fadata.bg
Subject: Re: i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ?
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:33:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020103153355.612bd269.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201031106590.24031-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1010015450.15492.19.camel@hh2.hhhome.at> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201031106590.24031-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:28:45 -0200 (BRST)
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> Another item to look into is removing the page cache hash table
> and replacing it by a radix tree or hash trie, in the hopes of
> improving scalability while at the same time saving some space.
Ah, didn't we see such a patch lately in LKML? If I remember correct I saw some
comparison charts too and some people testing it were happy with it. Just
searched through the list: 24. dec :-) by Momchil Velikov Can someone with big
mem have a look at the saving? How about 18-pre?
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-03 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-29 18:18 i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ? Harald Holzer
2001-12-29 18:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-29 21:24 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-12-30 0:25 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-12-30 2:14 ` Harald Holzer
2001-12-30 2:33 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-01 18:15 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-01 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-01 19:02 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-02 1:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-02 21:17 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-01-06 8:20 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-01-06 16:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-06 20:23 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-01-06 23:37 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-01-07 0:29 ` The COUGAR Project M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-07 2:18 ` i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ? Marvin Justice
2002-01-07 2:38 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-01-07 4:40 ` T. A.
2002-01-07 16:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-01-02 17:30 ` Timothy D. Witham
[not found] ` <1009994687.12942.14.camel@hh2.hhhome.at>
[not found] ` <1009995669.1253.17.camel@wookie-laptop.pdx.osdl.net>
2002-01-02 23:50 ` Harald Holzer
2002-01-03 0:16 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-03 13:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-04 12:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-01-04 12:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 0:17 ` Mark Zealey
2002-01-03 13:28 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 14:33 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-01-03 16:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 15:15 ` Anton Blanchard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-29 19:25 Dieter Nützel
2002-01-06 18:39 Daniel Freedman
2002-01-06 18:59 ` Marvin Justice
2002-01-06 19:45 ` Daniel Freedman
2002-01-06 20:15 ` Marvin Justice
2002-01-07 5:17 ` Daniel Freedman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020103153355.612bd269.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=harald.holzer@eunet.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=velco@fadata.bg \
--cc=wookie@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox