From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@zip.com.au, znmeb@aracnet.com,
art@lsr.nei.nih.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kswapd etc hogging machine
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:27:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020103182756.237453bd.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201031448410.24031-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <E16M72b-0008B8-00@the-village.bc.nu> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201031448410.24031-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:51:01 -0200 (BRST)
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > 2.4.1x VM code is performing better under light loads but its
> > absolutely and completely hopeless under a real paging load. 2.4.17-aa
> > is somewhat better interestingly.
>
> A quick 'make -j bzImage' test I did yesterday got the system
> to use near 70% of its CPU time in user mode and 30% in system
> mode. This was with 2.4.17-rmap-10b, btw.
And what kind of an argument is this? This is an honest question, really. If I
do this make I end up around 80-90% in user mode and the rest in system on a
standard 2.4.17 SMP box (configured with too less swap btw).
???
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-03 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-03 3:33 kswapd etc hogging machine Art Hays
2002-01-03 4:01 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-03 4:13 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-03 5:15 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-03 5:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-03 5:54 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2002-01-03 12:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-03 16:51 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 17:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-01-03 17:32 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 23:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-03 18:59 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-04 7:06 ` Art Hays
2002-01-03 12:37 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020103182756.237453bd.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=art@lsr.nei.nih.gov \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=znmeb@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox