From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 05:28:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020106052815.F10391@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020106123913.GA5407@krispykreme> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201061403120.3859-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201061403120.3859-100000@Appserv.suse.de>; from davej@suse.de on Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:07:05PM +0100
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>> Therefore there is no reason to waste 8 bytes per page when every page
>> points to the same zone!
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:07:05PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> Some of the low end single zone machines (m68k, sparc32, arm etc)
> could benefit from losing ->virtual too. wli has patches in
> his dir on kernel.org that do this (and other struct page reductions)
> The newer ones are against Rik's rmap vm though iirc, so you may have to
> frob a bit to get them to play with the stock vm.
I can personally (and quite quickly) port the page size reductions to
other VM's, as the changes required are not particularly invasive.
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:07:05PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> It'd be nice to see all these patches reducing this struct consolidated,
> right now they're all ifdefing different bits with different names..
I can correct style issues and the like for at least the bits I'm
responsible for in very short order. I'll consolidate the waitqueue,
->virtual and ->zone removals within the hour, since that appears to
be wanted/needed.
Anton, do you want to take on mixing the zone into ->flags folding with
your approach?
Cheers,
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-06 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-06 12:39 [PATCH] Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs Anton Blanchard
2002-01-06 13:02 ` Horst von Brand
2002-01-06 13:07 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-06 13:13 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-06 13:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-06 13:28 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-01-06 14:08 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-06 14:44 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-07 1:25 ` results: " Anton Blanchard
2002-01-07 3:22 ` Richard Henderson
2002-01-14 6:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-01-15 0:45 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-07 5:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-06 13:11 ` [PATCH] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-06 13:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-01-06 13:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020106052815.F10391@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox