From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 05:51:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020106055147.G10391@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020106123913.GA5407@krispykreme> <20020106051134.E10391@holomorphy.com> <20020106133326.GD30292@krispykreme>
In-Reply-To: <20020106133326.GD30292@krispykreme>; from anton@samba.org on Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:33:26AM +1100
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:33:26AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> For archs that need ->zone, merging it with ->flags sounds like a
> great idea. Id like to cram something into ->flags on 64 bit archs
> since its only a long due to bitop constraints. I had thought of
> stuffing ->count in the high word but now Im just getting silly
> since all non atomic accesses to ->flags would then have to be word
> ones.
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> My i386 version, which makes ->virtual conditional on CONFIG_HIGHMEM as
>> well, is at:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:33:26AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Id like to do redo some profiling, on ppc64 we had page_address() doing
> pointer arithmetic (instead of page->virtual) and the compiler created
> an awful sequence of instructions in the acenic interrupt handler.
> A zero copy TCP benchmark made it rather obvious.
I'm not entirely surprised at this, CONFIG_HIGHMEM is probably just
not quite a strict enough criterion for eliminating ->virtual as it's
a time/space tradeoff that just happens to be bad on ppc64. Maybe we
should figure out some other criterion in addition to it.
Cheers,
Bill
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-06 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-06 12:39 [PATCH] Remove 8 bytes from struct page on 64bit archs Anton Blanchard
2002-01-06 13:02 ` Horst von Brand
2002-01-06 13:07 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-06 13:13 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-06 13:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-06 13:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-06 14:08 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-06 14:44 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-07 1:25 ` results: " Anton Blanchard
2002-01-07 3:22 ` Richard Henderson
2002-01-14 6:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-01-15 0:45 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-07 5:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-06 13:11 ` [PATCH] " William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-06 13:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-01-06 13:51 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020106055147.G10391@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox