From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] klibc requirements
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:09:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020109060951.GA18024@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020108192450.GA14734@kroah.com> <20020109042331.GB31644@codeblau.de> <20020109045109.GA17776@kroah.com> <a1giqs$93d$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <a1giqs$93d$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:01:16PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Why should it be included in the kernel image? That's not the current
> plan, as far as I know. It should be a separate file or set of files
> loaded by the bootloader (using an enhanced initrd protocol backward
> compatible with old bootloaders.)
Hm, missed those messages. I remember talk of adding the initramfs
image to the kernel image itself, which keeps from having to change any
bootloaders. But if this has changed, that's ok with me.
Is any of this written down all in one place?
> Of course, it might be convenient
> to have them come out of the same source distribution, but that's
> really an unrelated issue.
If the files contain kernel modules, they need to come out of the same
source distribution :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-08 19:24 [RFC] klibc requirements Greg KH
2002-01-08 20:37 ` Erik Andersen
2002-01-09 4:23 ` Felix von Leitner
2002-01-09 4:34 ` initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements) Greg KH
2002-01-09 6:10 ` Greg KH
2002-01-09 7:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-09 9:33 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-01-09 10:00 ` Erik Andersen
2002-01-09 4:51 ` [RFC] klibc requirements Greg KH
2002-01-09 5:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-09 6:09 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-01-09 7:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-10 6:30 ` Rusty Russell
2002-01-10 18:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-10 15:24 ` Matthias Kilian
2002-01-10 17:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-09 14:15 ` Felix von Leitner
2002-01-09 14:30 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-01-09 14:51 ` Erik Andersen
2002-01-09 10:38 ` initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements) Anton Altaparmakov
2002-01-09 15:56 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-09 16:04 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-01-09 16:26 ` Greg KH
2002-01-09 16:29 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-09 16:48 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-01-09 21:15 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2002-01-09 21:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-01-09 21:40 ` Greg KH
2002-01-09 21:55 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-01-09 22:15 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-01-10 0:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-01-10 0:38 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-01-10 2:42 ` Tom Rini
2002-01-10 14:09 ` Rob Landley
2002-01-10 22:24 ` Tom Rini
2002-01-11 0:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-09 22:12 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2002-01-09 13:23 ` [RFC] klibc requirements Juan Quintela
2002-01-09 14:57 ` Erik Andersen
2002-01-15 3:08 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-15 11:55 ` Felix von Leitner
2002-01-15 14:54 ` David Lang
2002-01-15 16:15 ` Doug McNaught
2002-01-15 18:06 ` David Lang
2002-01-15 18:36 ` Doug McNaught
2002-01-16 18:36 ` Erik Andersen
2002-01-16 7:50 ` Albert D. Cahalan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020109060951.GA18024@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox