Re: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements)

Dave Jones
2002-01-10T11:22:53Z

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > We have also been over the fact that dmidecode, if written
> > appropriately, could be setuid, or call a "dmicat" setuid program.
> > This is a dmidecode implementation detail.
> We've also proved the DMI data is too unreliable to be used, so the entire
> problem space is irrelevant

That's not a problem, remember Eric volunteered to maintain the
enormous black list 8-)

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs