Re: [RFC] klibc requirements

Erik Andersen
2002-01-09T14:52:14Z

On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Greg KH (greg@kroah.com):
> > > > - portable, runs on all platforms that the kernel currently
> > > > works on, but doesn't have to run on any non-Linux based OS.
> > You didn't address this. What are the future plans of porting dietLibc
> > to the platforms that are not currently supported by it (but are by
> > Linux)?
>
> We will attempt to port the diet libc to every Linux platform that we
> have access to. I won't go out and buy hardware to port my software to,
> so if anyone needs the diet libc ported somewhere, I need an account on
> a test box somewhere.
>
> We are currently missing sh-linux, ia64-linux and m68k-linux and
> probably a few architectures that I have never heard of ;)

uClibc runs on both sh and ,68k, so the only arch missing
coverage with either dietlibc or uClibc seems to be ia64.

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--