* CIPE vs. GPLONLY_
@ 2002-01-12 1:03 brian
2002-01-12 1:31 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: brian @ 2002-01-12 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
top# insmod /lib/modules/2.4.17/misc/cipcb.o
/lib/modules/2.4.17/misc/cipcb.o: unresolved symbol sk_run_filter
/lib/modules/2.4.17/misc/cipcb.o: Note: modules without a GPL compatible license cannot use GPLONLY_ symbols
running CIPE 1.5.2 I get the error above. Should I be bother the
CIPE people with this? Or is this some kernel thingy that needs
to be dealt with?
I remember reading on l-k a few times some stuff about GPLONLY_
but I have no idea what to do now that I've run into whatever
the problem is that is caused by this?
CIPE is a GPL'ed program.
--
Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
Copyright (c) 2002 By Brian Litzinger, All Rights Reserved
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIPE vs. GPLONLY_
2002-01-12 1:03 CIPE vs. GPLONLY_ brian
@ 2002-01-12 1:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-12 1:48 ` brian
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-01-12 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brian; +Cc: linux-kernel
> running CIPE 1.5.2 I get the error above. Should I be bother the
> CIPE people with this? Or is this some kernel thingy that needs
> to be dealt with?
Add
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
to the cipe code and all will be well
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIPE vs. GPLONLY_
2002-01-12 1:31 ` Alan Cox
@ 2002-01-12 1:48 ` brian
2002-01-12 3:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-12 4:57 ` brian
2002-01-12 11:37 ` Olaf Titz
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: brian @ 2002-01-12 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:31:24AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > running CIPE 1.5.2 I get the error above. Should I be bother the
> > CIPE people with this? Or is this some kernel thingy that needs
> > to be dealt with?
>
> Add
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> to the cipe code and all will be well
Thanks. I added that and now I'm just left with sk_run_filter
undef'ed without the GPLONLY_ warning.
I've deleted my kernel sources and am starting everything over
from scratch. I checked that 'CONFIG_FILTER' was defined
and all seemed in order, but still got the error.
I read through the last few months of the CIPE archives and there
is no mention of such a problem. Others mention running with
2.4.17, hence my start over.
--
Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
Copyright (c) 2002 By Brian Litzinger, All Rights Reserved
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIPE vs. GPLONLY_
2002-01-12 1:48 ` brian
@ 2002-01-12 3:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2002-01-12 3:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Litzinger, Alan Cox, linux-kernel
Em Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:48:30PM -0800, brian@worldcontrol.com escreveu:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:31:24AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > running CIPE 1.5.2 I get the error above. Should I be bother the
> > > CIPE people with this? Or is this some kernel thingy that needs
> > > to be dealt with?
> > Add
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > to the cipe code and all will be well
>
> Thanks. I added that and now I'm just left with sk_run_filter
> undef'ed without the GPLONLY_ warning.
>
> I've deleted my kernel sources and am starting everything over
> from scratch. I checked that 'CONFIG_FILTER' was defined
> and all seemed in order, but still got the error.
>
> I read through the last few months of the CIPE archives and there
> is no mention of such a problem. Others mention running with
> 2.4.17, hence my start over.
probably because they use an old modutils package...
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIPE vs. GPLONLY_
2002-01-12 1:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-12 1:48 ` brian
@ 2002-01-12 4:57 ` brian
2002-01-12 11:37 ` Olaf Titz
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: brian @ 2002-01-12 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:31:24AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > running CIPE 1.5.2 I get the error above. Should I be bother the
> > CIPE people with this? Or is this some kernel thingy that needs
> > to be dealt with?
>
> Add
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> to the cipe code and all will be well
As I posted in another email. The above changed helped but I still
had one undef'ed reference.
I removed my linux source tree, rebuilt everything, and now it
works fine.
--
Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
Copyright (c) 2002 By Brian Litzinger, All Rights Reserved
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: CIPE vs. GPLONLY_
2002-01-12 1:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-12 1:48 ` brian
2002-01-12 4:57 ` brian
@ 2002-01-12 11:37 ` Olaf Titz
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Olaf Titz @ 2002-01-12 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
> Add
>
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> to the cipe code and all will be well
That's already fixed in the CIPE CVS tree.
Olaf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-12 11:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-12 1:03 CIPE vs. GPLONLY_ brian
2002-01-12 1:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-12 1:48 ` brian
2002-01-12 3:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-12 4:57 ` brian
2002-01-12 11:37 ` Olaf Titz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox