From: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha)
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 performance regression(?) vs. 2.4.17
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:53:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020115025337.GC1226@iucha.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1398 bytes --]
Rik, Alan,
I have downloaded 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 out of curiosity for the VM and IDE
performance.
As a "benchmark" I ran hdparm -Tt /dev/hda. The results were surprising:
2.4.17
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.86 seconds =148.84 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.95 seconds = 16.20 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.90 seconds =142.22 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.05 seconds = 15.80 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.88 seconds =145.45 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.00 seconds = 16.00 MB/sec
2.4.18-pre3-ac2
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.99 seconds =129.29 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.90 seconds = 16.41 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.93 seconds =137.63 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.03 seconds = 15.88 MB/sec
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.92 seconds =139.13 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.90 seconds = 16.41 MB/sec
So while I see a slight (un)expected improvement in IDE performance, I
also see a degradation in memory? performance.
The box is a PIII/700MHz laptop with 256 Mb RAM. hdparm is version 4.5
Cheers,
florin
--
"If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is."
41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6 03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2002-01-15 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020115025337.GC1226@iucha.net \
--to=florin@iucha.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox