public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linuxdiskcert.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: block completion races
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:09:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020116080948.G3805@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C44DC7B.D960D15D@zip.com.au> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10201152001400.26467-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10201152001400.26467-100000@master.linux-ide.org>

On Tue, Jan 15 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> 
> We have a more interesting problem!
> This does not show up in 2.5.1 which is patch base for 2.5.3-pre1.
> It does show up in 2.5.2-pre10 but I have not walked the patch through
> 2.5.2preX series.
> 
> We have a very bad queue race that is PIO specific but really the whole
> darn driver before the patch was applied.  ACB only tighten the driver's
> alignment to the NCITS standards.  One should note the direct access via
> the ioctl does not lock the driver.  Only coming down from BLOCK will this
> event occur.
> 
> Repeatable test "hdparm -d0 -t /dev/hdx"
> 
> If you apply the acb-io patch to 2.5.1 this does not happen.
> 
> In the introduction of BIO, there were no "q->queue_lock" applied to
> protecting the queue.
> 
>         /*
>          * Is meant to protect the queue in the future instead of
>          * io_request_lock
>          */
>         spinlock_t              queue_lock;
> 
> Well we pulled "io_request_lock" but did we forgot to insert or add
> q->queue_lock spinlocks?
> 
> It is going to be a LONG LONG NIGHT :-(

ide_lock == q->queue_lock

ide-probe.c:ide_init_queue():	blk_init_queue(q, do_ide_request, &ide_lock);

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-16  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-16  1:50 block completion races Andrew Morton
2002-01-16  4:11 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-01-16  7:09   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2002-01-16  7:07 ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-16 16:55 Manfred Spraul
2002-01-16 18:50 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020116080948.G3805@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=andre@linuxdiskcert.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox