From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
feedback@suse.de
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:38:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020117093839.A20206@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020113223803.GA28085@emma1.emma.line.org> <20020114095013.A4760@namesys.com> <20020114140021.GD5711@emma1.emma.line.org> <20020114173030.A1901@namesys.com> <20020115174712.GB3182@emma1.emma.line.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020115174712.GB3182@emma1.emma.line.org>
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:47:12PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Looking at init/main.c and fs/super.c, rootfsflags parameter is never
> > saved, moreover - it's original value is destroyed, once initrd fs is
> > mounted. And I only see not very nice ways of fixing this, so perhaps
> > someone more exeprienced can come up with the solution? (my crappy
> > ides is not to do putname() on fs_names, if (real_root_dev !=
> > ROOT_DEV), all of this is only when CONFIG_..._INITRD enabled)
> Thanks for confirming a bug, so I understand that mounting an initrd
> loses the rootfsflags, and as the actual root= parameter is kept over an
> initrd boot, it should also be possible for rootfsflags= -- can the
> rootfsflags maybe be saved along with the root= parameter?
No. rootfsflags is saved. What is not saved is rootfstype. And yes, it can be saved, of course.
> > > Yup, reiserfs is last in /proc/filesystems when loaded as module, but on
> > > my private machine (where it's linked into the kernel), it's right after
> > > ext2 and before vfat.
> > Do you have vfat as a loadable module?
> Hum, yes, but that's not the point, someone turned up with a SuSE 7.3
This is the point in fact. If you'd have both reiserfs and vfat compiled-in,
you'd see that vfat ebfore reiserfs in /proc/filesystems.
Bye,
Oleg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-17 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-13 22:38 Boot failure: msdos pushes in front of reiserfs Matthias Andree
2002-01-14 6:50 ` [reiserfs-list] " Oleg Drokin
2002-01-14 11:16 ` Hans Reiser
2002-01-14 11:36 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-01-14 19:46 ` Hans Reiser
2002-01-14 20:21 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-01-14 20:21 ` Chris Mason
2002-01-14 20:29 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-01-14 14:00 ` Matthias Andree
2002-01-14 14:30 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-01-15 17:47 ` Matthias Andree
2002-01-17 6:38 ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020117093839.A20206@namesys.com \
--to=green@namesys.com \
--cc=feedback@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox