From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:57:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:57:23 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:40337 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 05:57:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 02:55:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20020118.025554.133432828.davem@redhat.com> To: fabien.ribes@cgey.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops in sock_poll From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3C47E46C.2E322EC6@cgey.com> In-Reply-To: <3C470105.ED9DDCE@cgey.com> <20020117.131224.108809922.davem@redhat.com> <3C47E46C.2E322EC6@cgey.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Fabien Ribes Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:01:32 +0000 "David S. Miller" wrote: > > Can you reproduce this with a more recent kernel? Anything > >=2.4.9 (this includes all Red Hat errata kernels therefore) > would be sufficient. The kernel used is customized in many ways, it is a long work to upgrade Then I can't help you... there have probably been many networking bugs fixed since 2.4.9