From: brian@worldcontrol.com
To: "Trever L. Adams" <tadams-lists@myrealbox.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Andrea Scrimieri <livore@karma.oltrelinux.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Rik spreading bullshit about VM
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:46:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020118014648.GA5250@top.worldcontrol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201171113270.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com> <1011303665.1230.5.camel@aurora>
In-Reply-To: <1011303665.1230.5.camel@aurora>
Let us not forget about 'deconstructionism':
deconstructionism -- (a philosophical theory of criticism ...
that seeks to expose deep-seated contradictions in a work
by delving below its surface meaning)
It doesn't even matter what Rik thinks he wrote. The real meaning is
what *we*, the readers, can devolve from his writings.
8-)
- Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>
> On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 08:15, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Which part of "to interprete" do you not understand ?
> >
> > Interpreting my text is reading it and building a
> > meaning for the words in your head. It doesn't mean
> > the text needs to be changed ... the meaning can be
> > different for each person reading the exact same
> > words.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> To an extant anyone is responsible for how another takes (interprets)
> what they say. Culture is that combined collection of knowledge of the
> human race. It is your responsibility as a human to be as clear as
> possible (within reason).
>
> Were you that clear? It seems not, but I don't know. Just don't say
> you have no responsibility for how others take what you say, because
> that is just dog crap. No communication or collaboration would ever
> take place if we all had that attitude. (It most likely couldn't take
> place, let alone wouldn't.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-18 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201162235480.32617-100000@imladris.surriel .com>
2002-01-16 19:04 ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-16 20:11 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-01-16 20:58 ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-16 21:10 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-16 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 13:42 ` [lkml] " Ian Soboroff
2002-01-18 3:21 ` ...Re: " Dan Mann
2002-01-17 0:20 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-01-16 21:17 ` Craig Knox
2002-01-16 20:58 ` Bongani Hlope
2002-01-16 20:55 ` John Levon
2002-01-16 21:21 ` Bongani Hlope
2002-01-16 21:29 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-01-17 14:17 ` async buffer flushing reported slowdown (could be a driver issue?) Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-18 0:28 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-01-16 21:58 ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Diego Calleja
2002-01-16 22:02 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 14:35 ` bugfix backed out Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 15:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 15:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 14:25 ` oom failures with mem=4m Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-16 21:59 ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Diego Calleja
2002-01-16 22:44 ` Chris Chabot
2002-01-17 8:18 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-01-17 14:13 ` blkdev speedup Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 0:07 ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Erik Mouw
2002-01-17 0:25 ` J Sloan
2002-01-17 1:15 ` Erik Mouw
2002-01-17 17:40 ` bill davidsen
2002-01-17 14:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-18 4:30 ` Bosko Radivojevic
2002-01-18 4:36 ` vm philosophising Rik van Riel
2002-01-18 4:58 ` Matthew Johnson
2002-01-18 5:12 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-18 5:18 ` Ryan Cumming
2002-01-18 5:43 ` Matthew Johnson
2002-01-21 17:55 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-01-18 6:05 ` Matthew Johnson
2002-01-18 14:42 ` Tommy Faasen
2002-01-18 15:52 ` listmail
2002-01-21 15:50 ` The Doctor What
2002-01-21 16:16 ` Mike Harrold
2002-01-18 15:55 ` Mr. Shannon Aldinger
2002-01-18 18:39 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-01-18 19:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-18 20:17 ` David Schwartz
2002-01-18 21:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-19 4:42 ` David Luyer
2002-01-19 18:00 ` Rob Landley
2002-01-20 5:42 ` Stevie O
2002-01-17 0:38 ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 1:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-01-17 11:45 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 12:02 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-17 2:14 ` Andrea Scrimieri
2002-01-17 12:07 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 13:11 ` Andrea Scrimieri
2002-01-17 13:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-17 21:41 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-01-18 1:46 ` brian [this message]
2002-01-17 1:52 ` Stephen Satchell
2002-01-17 13:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-17 15:10 ` clarification about redhat and vm Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 15:21 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 16:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-17 16:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-18 16:46 ` Wilhelm Nuesser
2002-01-18 19:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-19 10:50 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-01-19 13:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-19 17:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-18 16:53 ` Willi Nüßer
2002-01-16 21:49 Rik spreading bullshit about VM Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-17 0:08 V-man
2002-01-17 0:31 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 7:44 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-01-17 11:11 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 15:25 ` John Jasen
2002-01-17 1:16 Andrea Scrimieri
2002-01-17 1:26 rwhron
2002-01-17 19:08 ` bill davidsen
2002-01-17 19:49 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 20:22 ` Dan Chen
2002-01-17 4:01 rwhron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020118014648.GA5250@top.worldcontrol.com \
--to=brian@worldcontrol.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=livore@karma.oltrelinux.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=tadams-lists@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox