public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>,
	Wilhelm Nuesser <wilhelm.nuesser@sap.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: clarification about redhat and vm
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 18:38:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020119183845.E21279@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3wuye397w.fsf@linux.local> <E16Rvwa-0001ES-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16Rvwa-0001ES-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:54:04PM +0000

On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:54:04PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > BTW since we are just bashing VMs: I always hear that 2.2 is so much
> > better: The first 2.2 kernel which could really survive this test was
> > 2.2.19!
> 
> That I can believe. With the exception of the dcache balancing problem the
> 2.2.19/20 VM basically eliminated all 2.2 bug reports on VM behaviour.

can you reproduce the dcache problem with this patch applied?

	ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.2/2.2.20aa1/00_inode-boot-dynamic-3

The grow of the dcache in 2.2 is bound to the grow of the icache which
is not dynamic in 2.2. (modulo hardlinks but I don't think the guy was
using hardlinks)

Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-19 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201162235480.32617-100000@imladris.surriel .com>
2002-01-16 19:04 ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-16 20:11   ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2002-01-16 20:58   ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-16 21:10     ` Dave Jones
2002-01-16 21:17       ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 13:42         ` [lkml] " Ian Soboroff
2002-01-18  3:21         ` ...Re: " Dan Mann
2002-01-17  0:20       ` Luigi Genoni
2002-01-16 21:17     ` Craig Knox
2002-01-16 20:58   ` Bongani Hlope
2002-01-16 20:55     ` John Levon
2002-01-16 21:21       ` Bongani Hlope
2002-01-16 21:29   ` Adam Kropelin
2002-01-17 14:17     ` async buffer flushing reported slowdown (could be a driver issue?) Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-18  0:28       ` Adam Kropelin
2002-01-16 21:58   ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Diego Calleja
2002-01-16 22:02     ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 14:35       ` bugfix backed out Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 15:04         ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 15:52           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 14:25     ` oom failures with mem=4m Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-16 21:59   ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Diego Calleja
2002-01-16 22:44   ` Chris Chabot
2002-01-17  8:18     ` Christoph Rohland
2002-01-17 14:13     ` blkdev speedup Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17  0:07   ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Erik Mouw
2002-01-17  0:25     ` J Sloan
2002-01-17  1:15       ` Erik Mouw
2002-01-17 17:40       ` bill davidsen
2002-01-17 14:14     ` Alan Cox
2002-01-18  4:30     ` Bosko Radivojevic
2002-01-18  4:36       ` vm philosophising Rik van Riel
2002-01-18  4:58         ` Matthew Johnson
2002-01-18  5:12           ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-18  5:18           ` Ryan Cumming
2002-01-18  5:43             ` Matthew Johnson
2002-01-21 17:55               ` Bill Davidsen
2002-01-18  6:05             ` Matthew Johnson
2002-01-18 14:42         ` Tommy Faasen
2002-01-18 15:52           ` listmail
2002-01-21 15:50           ` The Doctor What
2002-01-21 16:16             ` Mike Harrold
2002-01-18 15:55         ` Mr. Shannon Aldinger
2002-01-18 18:39         ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-01-18 19:23           ` Alan Cox
2002-01-18 20:17             ` David Schwartz
2002-01-18 21:39               ` Alan Cox
2002-01-19  4:42             ` David Luyer
2002-01-19 18:00               ` Rob Landley
2002-01-20  5:42               ` Stevie O
2002-01-17  0:38   ` Rik spreading bullshit about VM Rik van Riel
2002-01-17  1:50     ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-01-17 11:45       ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 12:02         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-17  2:14     ` Andrea Scrimieri
2002-01-17 12:07       ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 13:11         ` Andrea Scrimieri
2002-01-17 13:15           ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 14:02             ` Alan Cox
2002-01-17 21:41             ` Trever L. Adams
2002-01-18  1:46               ` brian
2002-01-17  1:52   ` Stephen Satchell
2002-01-17 13:26   ` Alan Cox
2002-01-17 15:10     ` clarification about redhat and vm Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-17 15:21       ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-17 16:17       ` Alan Cox
2002-01-17 16:31         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-18 16:46         ` Wilhelm Nuesser
2002-01-18 19:07           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-19 10:50             ` Christoph Rohland
2002-01-19 13:54               ` Alan Cox
2002-01-19 17:38                 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-01-18 16:53         ` Willi Nüßer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020119183845.E21279@athlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=cr@sap.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=wilhelm.nuesser@sap.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox