From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de, alan@redhat.com,
akpm@zip.com.au, vherva@niksula.hut.fi
Subject: Re: Athlon/AGP issue update
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:24:41 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020123.022441.21593293.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200201231010.g0NAAuE05886@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
In-Reply-To: <1011779573.9368.40.camel@inventor.gentoo.org> <200201231010.g0NAAuE05886@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:10:57 -0200
Did AMD tell in what 4M page a cache line was speculativery read ant then
written? I mean, there are only a few 4M pages used by Linux, which one had
'cacheable' bit wrongly set? It's all we need to know now.
See my other email, actually it appears AMD tells us this and my
previous analysis was wrong.
> The problem that has been experienced is caused by a speculative store
> instruction that is not ultimately executed. The logical address of the
> store is through the 4MB translation to physical memory also translated
> by GART and used by the AGP processor.
>
> The effect of the store is to write-allocate a cache line in the data
> cache and fill that cache line with data from the underlying physical
> memory. Because the line was write-allocated it is subsequently written
> back to physical memory even though the bits have not been changed by
> the processor. This write-back occurs when the cache-line is
> re-allocated based upon replacement policy and is far removed in time
> from the point at which the bits were read.
He can only mean by this that there is some branch protected store
(not taken) to the 4MB linear mappings used by the kernel (starting
at PAGE_OFFSET).
But the only thing I am still confused about, is what 4MB mappings
have to do with any of this. What I take from the description is that
the problem will still exist after 4MB mappings are disabled. What
prevents the processor from doing the speculative store to the
cacheable mappings once 4MB pages are disabled?
At best, I bet turning off 4MB pages makes the bug less likely.
It does not eliminate the chance to hit the bug.
So what it sounds like is that if there is any cacheable mapping
_WHATSOEVER_ to physical memory accessible by the GART, the problem
can occur due to a speculative store being cancelled.
A real fix would be much more involved, therefore.
In fact, we map the GART mapped memory to the user fully cacheable.
That would have to be fixed, plus we'd need to mark non-cacheable the
linear PAGE_OFFSET mappings of the kernel (4MB or not) as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-23 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-23 9:52 Athlon/AGP issue update Daniel Robbins
2002-01-23 10:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-23 2:46 ` benh
2002-01-23 14:08 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-23 15:47 ` benh
2002-01-25 18:34 ` Val Henson
2002-01-26 0:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-01-27 19:22 ` Val Henson
2002-01-27 19:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-01-23 16:31 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-23 16:57 ` Daniel Robbins
2002-01-23 17:14 ` benh
2002-01-23 23:14 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-25 18:17 ` Val Henson
2002-01-23 19:20 ` Oliver Neukum
[not found] ` <200201231010.g0NAAuE05886@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2002-01-23 10:24 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-01-23 10:31 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-23 11:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-23 11:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-23 11:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-23 17:09 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-01-23 18:38 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-23 10:38 Studierende der Universitaet des Saarlandes
2002-01-23 11:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-23 12:32 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-23 12:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-23 12:41 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-23 14:50 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-01-23 11:44 ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-23 11:49 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020123.022441.21593293.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
--cc=vherva@niksula.hut.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox