From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Jakob ?stergaard <jakob@unthought.net>,
Ville Herva <vherva@twilight.cs.hut.fi>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:31:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020123113122.GC965@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020119232455.D12692@unthought.net> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0201191749300.5397-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0201191749300.5397-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
Hi!
> > > All this seems very neat. One question: what about forced umount / forced
> > > remount readonly stuff? Any plans on that?
> > >
> >
> > That would be *very* nice indeed. Even if it was only for things like NFS
> > and SMBFS.
>
> umount(mountpoint, MNT_DETACH);
>
> Had been there for quite a while...
>
> It's not a forced umount - it detaches the subtree from mountpoint and
> filesystem(s) go away when they stop being busy. But for remote
> filesystems that's precisely what you want.
Can I umount filesystems below them? Can I reboot with
busy-but-detached filesystems? Can I kill the processes accessing busy
filesystems? [That was big point of force umount, I believe.]
Pavel
--
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-23 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-18 6:33 [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002 Guillaume Boissiere
2002-01-18 7:26 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2002-01-18 7:29 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-18 7:53 ` hjb
2002-01-18 10:00 ` Russell King
2002-01-18 10:20 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-18 15:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-18 15:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-18 10:57 ` Alexander Viro
2002-01-18 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-19 18:43 ` Ville Herva
2002-01-19 22:24 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-01-19 22:42 ` Ville Herva
2002-01-19 22:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-01-23 11:31 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2002-01-23 22:55 ` Alexander Viro
2002-01-24 12:29 ` force umount [was Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002] Pavel Machek
2002-01-24 17:00 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-01-23 22:57 ` [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002 Alexander Viro
2002-01-18 11:21 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-20 12:02 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-20 12:37 ` David Weinehall
2002-01-20 22:57 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-19 9:17 Rick A. Hohensee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020123113122.GC965@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vherva@twilight.cs.hut.fi \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox