From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>,
rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18pre4aa1
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:29:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020125182901.J28068@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020125061801.W1735@khan.acc.umu.se> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201251502230.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201251502230.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:03:16PM -0200
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:03:16PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> The -aa kernel seems to contain patches to a few dozen subsystems.
> The -rmap patch is pretty much only VM changes.
> You're right that this is not a strict VM vs VM comparison...
Agreed. Andrea's tree seemed to gain quite a bit of a lead
when bits of the lowlat patches were applied for eg.
Just taking 00_vm_?? from ../people/andrea/.. would give better
comparison for a head to head vm pissing contest.
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-25 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-24 5:23 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-24 6:27 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-25 0:09 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-28 9:53 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-28 15:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-28 20:28 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-28 23:40 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-29 0:15 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29 13:05 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Pavel Machek
2002-01-25 0:19 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 0:29 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 3:23 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 3:35 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 4:56 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-25 4:57 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 5:18 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 David Weinehall
2002-01-25 17:03 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Rik van Riel
2002-01-25 17:29 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-01-25 12:26 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dave Jones
2002-01-25 14:57 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 rwhron
2002-01-28 0:37 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-25 0:11 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-22 6:48 2.4.18pre4aa1 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-22 6:58 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
2002-01-22 7:37 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Dan Chen
2002-01-22 7:43 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
2002-01-22 10:02 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Russell King
2002-01-22 10:12 ` 2.4.18pre4aa1 Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020125182901.J28068@suse.de \
--to=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=tao@acc.umu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox