From: David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se>
To: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Grover Andrew <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
"'lwn@lwn.net'" <lwn@lwn.net>,
"Acpi-linux (E-mail)" <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: ACPI mentioned on lwn.net/kernel
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 09:10:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020126091024.E1735@khan.acc.umu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201251019230.800-100000@segfault.osdlab.org> <E16UBRa-0003IA-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20020126033703.E5730@kushida.apsleyroad.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020126033703.E5730@kushida.apsleyroad.org>; from lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk on Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 03:37:03AM +0000
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 03:37:03AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > > (*) Aside from any potential copyright infringement on the tables
> > > themselves. But, it is theoretically possible to override the DSDT with
> >
> > Criminal liability under the DMCA and five years in jail too, along with
> > having your SF account pulled and losing your ISP access at the first
> > suggestion of copyright issues - and since you posted that email you are
> > clearly not doing so by accident.
>
> Fortunately he was citing a legitimate purpose: to workaround ACPI table
> bugs. Perhaps some judges favour legitimacy while other ones favour
> corruption; choose your judges wisely :-)
I doubt that working around bugs is allowed either; one could argue that
both region-coding and CSS are bugs disabling me from seeing particular
DVD's and for sure that new CD-protection scheme is a bug, considering
the "CD":s they produce don't even qualify as such according to
Phillips(?)
Regards: David Weinehall
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-26 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-25 1:29 ACPI mentioned on lwn.net/kernel Grover, Andrew
2002-01-25 16:50 ` Jonathan Corbet
2002-01-25 18:49 ` Alexander Viro
2002-01-28 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
2002-01-25 17:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-25 18:31 ` [ACPI] " Patrick Mochel
2002-01-25 18:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-26 3:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-01-26 8:10 ` David Weinehall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020126091024.E1735@khan.acc.umu.se \
--to=tao@acc.umu.se \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=lwn@lwn.net \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox