From: Michal Jaegermann <michal@harddata.com>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:46:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020127114642.A2288@mail.harddata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020126171545.GB11344@fefe.de> <3C52E671.605FA2F3@mandrakesoft.com> <3C540A90.5020904@evision-ventures.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C540A90.5020904@evision-ventures.com>; from dalecki@evision-ventures.com on Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:11:28PM +0100
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> I would like to notice that the changes in 2.4.18-pre7 to the
> tulip eth driver are apparently causing absymal performance drops
> on my version of this card.
Well, from what I know 'tulip' driver in later 2.4 kernels simply does
NOT work with any of my tulip cards, on x86 or on alpha, with a version
higher that something like 0.9.14a (which was yet in 2.4.6-ac4, I think;
I may have versions details wrong at this moment and would have to do
some digging to be sure). In other words its performance is unable to
drop any lower does not matter what I will do.
I reported that a few times in the past, including dumps of PCI
registers and other diagnostic information, but I was never dignified
even with "Yes, noted, and maybe later ..." response.
There were other posting with similar reports so it does not look like
that I am unique in that position. I am just using 'de4x5' driver
instead but I never had problems with 'tulip' in 2.2 series.
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-27 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-26 17:15 question about sparc 64-bit user land Felix von Leitner
2002-01-26 17:24 ` Ben Collins
2002-01-26 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 14:11 ` CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7 Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 16:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 17:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 17:53 ` root
2002-01-27 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-28 12:06 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-28 15:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-27 18:46 ` Michal Jaegermann [this message]
2002-01-27 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-28 3:40 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-26 18:07 ` question about sparc 64-bit user land Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020127114642.A2288@mail.harddata.com \
--to=michal@harddata.com \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox