public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Michal Jaegermann <michal@harddata.com>
Cc: dalecki@evision-ventures.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:58:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020127225845.1bc1453a.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020127114642.A2288@mail.harddata.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020126171545.GB11344@fefe.de> <3C52E671.605FA2F3@mandrakesoft.com> <3C540A90.5020904@evision-ventures.com> <20020127114642.A2288@mail.harddata.com>

On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 11:46:42 -0700
Michal Jaegermann <michal@harddata.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 03:11:28PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > I would like to notice that the changes in 2.4.18-pre7 to the
> > tulip eth driver are apparently causing absymal performance drops
> > on my version of this card.
> 
> Well, from what I know 'tulip' driver in later 2.4 kernels simply does
> NOT work with any of my tulip cards, on x86 or on alpha, with a version
> higher that something like 0.9.14a (which was yet in 2.4.6-ac4, I think;
> I may have versions details wrong at this moment and would have to do
> some digging to be sure).  In other words its performance is unable to
> drop any lower does not matter what I will do.

Hm, maybe you should shortly state which vendor (OEM or the like) you are
using. I generally cannot confirm any problems with tulip-driver in 2.4.
I use a wide variety of cards including 4 port cards, very old 21041 DLink,
the former DFE-series etc.
Maybe this is a specific problem with a certain vendor or board type?

Regards,
Stephan




  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-27 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-26 17:15 question about sparc 64-bit user land Felix von Leitner
2002-01-26 17:24 ` Ben Collins
2002-01-26 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 14:11   ` CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7 Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 16:50     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 17:32       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 17:53         ` root
2002-01-27 21:08           ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-28 12:06             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-28 15:37               ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-27 18:46     ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-27 21:58       ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-01-28  3:40         ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-26 18:07 ` question about sparc 64-bit user land Andreas Jaeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020127225845.1bc1453a.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal@harddata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox