From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: kaos@ocs.com.au
Cc: garzik@havoc.gtf.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
davidm@hpl.hp.com, ralf@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:26:43 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020131.222643.85689058.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7245.1012543865@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020131.220121.39157969.davem@redhat.com> <7245.1012543865@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:11:05 +1100
Except my proposal would have put all the initialization order
information together, instead of putting some information in the
source and some in the Makefiles.
NONE OF IT IS IN THE MAKEFILES! Please change your perspective
to see this!
If you have a dependency concern, you put yourself in the
right initcall group. You don't depend ever on the order within the
group, thats the whole idea. You can't depend on that, so you must
group things correctly.
Again, if you have some dependency within the initcall group, then
you're grouping things incorrectly. If the grouping is selected
properly, you could link in the total opposite order all the objects
and it still would work out fine.
I think your complaints are for problems that don't really exist.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020131.162549.74750188.davem@redhat.com>
2002-02-01 0:42 ` [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does Alan Cox
2002-02-01 0:30 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 3:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 4:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 4:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 5:59 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 5:10 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01 5:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 5:18 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01 13:42 ` Horst von Brand
2002-02-03 23:34 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-04 20:14 ` Horst von Brand
2002-02-01 6:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 6:11 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01 6:26 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-02-01 6:43 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01 15:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 14:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 15:12 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-02-01 15:29 ` VESA Anybody out there Martin Dalecki
2002-02-01 15:42 ` Davidovac Zoran
2002-02-01 16:21 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-01 16:33 ` Thomas Capricelli
2002-02-01 16:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-01 16:35 ` Sergey S. Kostyliov
2002-02-01 16:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-02-01 16:33 ` Petr Baudis
2002-02-01 17:45 ` The Candyman
2002-02-02 13:41 ` Andreas Happe
2002-02-02 21:09 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-05 17:05 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-01 16:08 ` [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does David Woodhouse
2002-02-04 13:24 ` Horst von Brand
2002-02-05 7:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 4:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-01 4:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 19:37 ` Rob Landley
2002-02-01 19:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-31 22:59 [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does not David S. Miller
2002-01-31 23:24 ` [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does Alan Cox
2002-01-31 23:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-02-02 16:32 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-02 12:57 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-02 13:16 ` arjan
2002-02-02 13:52 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-03 11:37 ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-31 23:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-31 23:45 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 0:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 10:07 ` Horst von Brand
2002-02-01 10:28 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01 11:03 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 11:25 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01 14:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 8:14 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-02 2:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-02-02 3:01 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-02 7:30 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-02-02 7:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-02 8:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-02 19:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-02 8:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-02 8:08 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-02 8:40 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-02 8:59 ` Keith Owens
2002-02-02 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-03 4:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-03 7:01 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-02-03 9:13 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-02-03 12:16 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-03 12:33 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-02-03 12:47 ` David Woodhouse
2002-02-03 13:40 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020131.222643.85689058.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=garzik@havoc.gtf.org \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@gnu.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox