From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:33:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:33:08 -0500 Received: from 12-224-37-81.client.attbi.com ([12.224.37.81]:39431 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:32:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:31:24 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Mark McClelland Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: ov511 verbose startup. Message-ID: <20020131053124.GI31006@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20020131023457.D31313@suse.de> <20020131035936.GD31006@kroah.com> <3C58D69B.6000205@alpha.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C58D69B.6000205@alpha.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.20 (i586) Reply-By: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 01:45:06 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:31:07PM -0800, Mark McClelland wrote: > > Greg (if you know): usbfs is not allowed to access claimed interfaces, > correct? (ie. ones that are implicitly claimed because of a successful > return from probe()). Are interfaces treated as claimed while probe() is > active, so that user-space "probes" cannot interfere with driver probes()? Yes, but odds are, it is trying to read the configuration of the device, and we don't have control pipe locking, yet :) Dave, does this problem go away on 2.5.3-pre6? And which host controller driver are you using? thanks, greg k-h