From: "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1013023458.e87e05@flounder.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: should I trust 'free' or 'top'?
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:24:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020201192415.GC23997@flounder.net> (raw)
There have been a lot of issues lately on our oracle servers with runaway
processes and swapping, enough that I feel compelled to report them here. We
have tried all different kernels from 2.4.6 to 2.4.16, and the problem seems
to happen with all of them (but is more pronounced on certain kernels)
Basically, what happens is that after an unspecified amount of time, the
boxes will become unresponsve and start swapping wildly. At that time, I
will login to the box to see what is going on, and I generally see something
like this:
adam@xpdb:~$ uptime
11:21am up 42 days, 18:53, 3 users, load average: 54.72, 21.21, 17.60
adam@xpdb:~$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 5528464 5522744 5720 0 476 5349784
-/+ buffers/cache: 172484 5355980
Swap: 2939804 1302368 1637436
As you can see, there are supposedly 5.3 gigs of memory free (not counting
memory used for cache). However, the box is swapping like mad (about 10 megs
every 2 seconds according to vmstat) and the load is skyrocketing.
Now top, on the other hand, has a very different idea about the amount of
free memory:
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.1% system, 0.1% nice, 0.0% idle
Mem: 5528464K av, 5523484K used, 4980K free, 0K shrd, 340K buff
Swap: 2939804K av, 1082008K used, 1857796K free 5351892K
cached
So, what am I supposed to believe? Is 'free' a useful tool? Is it providing
accurate results? I'm constantly fielding questions from people who want to
know why a box is swapping, even though 'free' reports a whole bunch of
memory free, and I'm tired of not having an answer for them.
Thanks,
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> | GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-01 19:24 Adam McKenna [this message]
2002-02-01 19:50 ` should I trust 'free' or 'top'? Peter Makholm
2002-02-01 19:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02 7:18 ` Buddy Lumpkin
2002-02-02 17:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-02-02 17:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02 19:58 ` David Lang
2002-02-02 20:35 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 20:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-02-01 20:32 ` Adam McKenna
2002-02-01 21:41 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-04 9:41 Martin Knoblauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020201192415.GC23997@flounder.net \
--to=adam-dated-1013023458.e87e05@flounder.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox