From: Johannes Erdfelt <johannes@erdfelt.com>
To: Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@sch.bme.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: uhci vs. usb-uhci: which is better?
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:03:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020202140313.P11223@sventech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0202021933360.2459-100000@balu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0202021933360.2459-100000@balu>; from pozsy@sch.bme.hu on Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 07:37:24PM +0100
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002, Pozsar Balazs <pozsy@sch.bme.hu> wrote:
> What is the difference between the usb-uhci and the uhci modules?
> Are there any cases where only one suitable?
>
> In short: which is 'better'?
The better one is probably the one that works for you.
JE
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-02 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-02 18:37 uhci vs. usb-uhci: which is better? Pozsar Balazs
2002-02-02 19:03 ` Johannes Erdfelt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020202140313.P11223@sventech.com \
--to=johannes@erdfelt.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pozsy@sch.bme.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox