From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: Momchil Velikov <velco@fadata.bg>
Cc: rwhron@earthlink.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:59:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020204035905.GA8208@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020202192334.GA21556@earthlink.net> <877kpuw37k.fsf@fadata.bg>
In-Reply-To: <877kpuw37k.fsf@fadata.bg>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:33:19AM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> Hmm, I've got different results with bonnie++, are you sure you didn't
> swap the results :)
I don't think so, but I notice that bonnie++ Sequential and Random Create
tests flucuate a lot. These are on 16384 small files in my tests.
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
2.4.17 16 4217 97 +++++ +++ 4664 99 4354 99 +++++ +++ 4090 95
16 4423 99 +++++ +++ 4266 90 4404 95 +++++ +++ 4382 100
16 4468 97 +++++ +++ 4899 99 4522 99 +++++ +++ 4235 95
16 4498 96 +++++ +++ 4777 100 4464 99 +++++ +++ 3854 90
16 4503 95 +++++ +++ 4990 99 4632 98 +++++ +++ 4058 90
2.4.17rat 16 2994 98 +++++ +++ 4548 94 2952 99 +++++ +++ 3967 92
16 3055 97 +++++ +++ 4705 93 4665 99 +++++ +++ 4119 94
16 4463 96 +++++ +++ 4670 100 4452 100 +++++ +++ 3775 94
16 4833 99 +++++ +++ 4823 100 4616 97 +++++ +++ 4054 92
16 4521 98 +++++ +++ 3907 88 4329 95 +++++ +++ 4111 100
The test against a 1GB (large) file vary somewhat too, but not as much as
the tests above. The results I posted earlier were the averages from 5 runs.
I just uploaded the raw logfiles from my testing (not just 2.4.17 and radix-tree)
to http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel (the tar.bz2 files are the logs).
--
Randy Hron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-04 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-02 19:23 [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5 rwhron
2002-02-03 14:31 ` chris
2002-02-03 23:33 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-04 3:59 ` rwhron [this message]
2002-02-06 2:04 ` rwhron
2002-02-06 11:44 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-06 21:34 rwhron
2002-02-06 21:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-06 22:06 ` rwhron
2002-02-07 11:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-07 11:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29 15:54 Christoph Hellwig
2002-01-29 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-29 21:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-29 22:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-29 23:01 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-29 23:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-29 23:35 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-30 3:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-31 23:44 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-01 0:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 11:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-01 11:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-02 18:57 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-02 21:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-29 23:02 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-29 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-29 23:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-01-30 21:25 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-30 22:05 ` John Stoffel
2002-01-30 22:15 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-31 2:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 13:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-31 14:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-31 16:39 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-31 17:19 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-31 17:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 17:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-01-31 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 18:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 18:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-31 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 19:09 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-31 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-31 21:12 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-31 19:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-01-31 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-31 21:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-31 23:12 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-01-31 23:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-02-01 0:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-16 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-02-01 3:56 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-01 6:32 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 18:38 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-01 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 7:59 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 9:01 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 9:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 9:07 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-01 9:13 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-01 18:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 18:44 ` arjan
2002-02-01 19:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-02 15:39 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-05 14:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-05 18:45 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-05 20:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2002-02-05 20:46 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-06 9:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-05 9:19 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2002-02-01 23:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 14:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-02-01 14:59 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 17:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-01 15:26 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-02-01 23:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-31 10:41 ` Josh MacDonald
2002-01-31 14:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-31 14:21 ` Momchil Velikov
2002-01-30 22:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-01-30 3:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29 23:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020204035905.GA8208@earthlink.net \
--to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=velco@fadata.bg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox