public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: The IBM order relaxation patch
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:13:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020206141304.A9349@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

I had a look at an IBM patch, which is described thus:

  - Order 2 allocation relief

  Symptom:  Under stress and after long uptimes of a 64 bit system
            the error message "__alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed."
            appears and either the fork of a new process fails or an
            active process dies.

  Problem:  The order 2 allocation problem is based in the size of the
            region and segement tables as defined by the zSeries
            architecture. A full region or segment table in 64 bit mode
            takes 16 KB of contigous real memory. The page allocation
            routines do not guarantee that a higher order allocation
            will succeed due to memory fragmentation.

  Solution: The order 2 allocation fix is supposed to reduce the number
            of order 2 allocations for the region and segment tables to
            a minimum. To do so it uses a feature of the architecture
            that allows to create incomplete region and segment tables.
            In almost all cases a process does not need full region or
            segment tables. If a full region or segment table is needed
            it is reallocated to the full size.

  This patch is very s/390 specific and breaks all other architectures.
  <<they meant "zSeries specific", surely --zaitcev>>

It's a stupid question, but: why can we not simply
wait until a desired unfragmented memory area is available,
with a GPF flag? What they describe does not happen in an
interrupt context, so we can sleep.

And another one: why not to increase a kernel-visible or "soft"
page size to 16KB for zSeries? It's a 64 bits platform. There
will be some increase in fragmentation, but nobody measured it.
Perhaps it's not going to be severe. It may even improve paging
efficiency.

-- Pete

P.S. The patch itself is at:
 http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/alpha_src/linux-2.4.7-order2-3.tar.gz

             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-06 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-06 19:13 Pete Zaitcev [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-06 21:50 The IBM order relaxation patch Ulrich Weigand
2002-02-07  0:18 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-07  4:01   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-07 12:16     ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-07 12:29       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-07 12:42         ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-07 12:58         ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-07 14:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-07 14:55   ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-07 15:07     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-07 15:10       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-09 20:21   ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2002-02-07 15:05 Ulrich Weigand
2002-02-07 15:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-07 17:57 ` Daniel Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020206141304.A9349@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox