From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:55:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:55:25 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([216.36.33.161]:21643 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:55:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 20:55:09 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Club LinuX , Utilisateurs Debian Fran?ais Subject: Re: [Re: Can't boot 2.4.17 or 2.5.1 kernel] problem solved ?! Message-ID: <20020207045509.GA785@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Club LinuX , Utilisateurs Debian Fran?ais In-Reply-To: <20020207015523.GA1267@oberon.ambre.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020207015523.GA1267@oberon.ambre.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:55:23AM +0100, Fabrice Eudes wrote: > more seriously, thanks to all the people making the ac kernel-variants. > Just one more -silly?- question: it seems -for me at least- that some > of the ac patches should be integrated in the kernel, why aren't they ? > (I repeat that ANY 2.4.17 variant I compiled won't even boot ! I'm not > talking about kernel panic here) > is my hardware so exotic ?? You should probably report this to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A more detailed description of your hardware and config options would probably also help. If you're willing to try some patches that might help with debugging early boot failures that might also give some insight into your troubles. Cheers, Bill