From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:12:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:12:16 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([216.36.33.161]:55443 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:12:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:11:51 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Balbir Singh Cc: tigran@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] larger kernel stack (8k->16k) per task (fwd) Message-ID: <20020208211151.GD767@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Balbir Singh , tigran@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 12:42:02PM -0800, Balbir Singh wrote: > It is highly recommended to use the existing stack size of > 8KB, increasing the stack size to 16KB with an 200 > processes running on an average causes 1.5MB of > extra memory to be used. This sounds small compared to the costs of struct page. Of course, I would be concerned regardless if this patch were for anything but debugging. Excellent work! Cheers, Bill