public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: thread_info implementation
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:51:00 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020211.185100.68039940.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15464.33256.837784.657759@napali.hpl.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <15464.32354.452126.182563@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20020211.183603.111204707.davem@redhat.com> <15464.33256.837784.657759@napali.hpl.hp.com>

   From: David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
   Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:46:00 -0800
   
   OK, so back to square one: why am I supposed to do all this work for
   something that will likely slow things slightly down and, at best,
   doesn't hurt performance?  The old set up works great and as far as
   I'm concerned, is not broken.

It keeps your platform the same, and it does help other platforms.
It is the nature of any abstraction change we make in the kernel
that platforms have to deal with.

So at least we're to the point where you could be convinced that
there are no down sides to the change?  Let's go over your list:

1) massive locore assembly changes

   ummm no, just put current_thread_info into your thread register

2) pointer dereference causes performance problems

   ummm no, not really, go test it for yourself if you don't
   believe me

This only leaves "I don't want to do the conversion because it has
no benefit to ia64."  Well, it doesn't hurt your platform either,
so just cope :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-12  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11 21:08 thread_info implementation Roman Zippel
2002-02-11 20:50 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12  0:46   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  0:57     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:57       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:10         ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:01         ` Bjorn Wesen
2002-02-12 13:49           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:01     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:07       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:21         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:32           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:36             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:41               ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:53                 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:22                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:30                     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:36                       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:46                         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:51                           ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-02-12  3:01                             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:04                               ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:18                                 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:23                                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:32                                     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:42                                       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  4:16                                         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  4:21                                           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  4:33                                             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  5:26                                       ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  5:32                                         ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  5:50                                           ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  5:57                                           ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-13 11:18                                         ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12 17:14                                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-13  0:46                                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-13  1:30                                     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:12                             ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:30                               ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12 10:14                                 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:21                             ` David Howells
2002-02-12 19:15                               ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12 19:38                                 ` David Howells
2002-02-12  2:49                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-02-12  0:01 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:10   ` David Howells
2002-02-12  0:22     ` Roman Zippel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-11 17:39 Arkadiy Chapkis - Arc
2002-02-11 20:19 ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 20:42   ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-11 20:48     ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 23:37       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-11 23:49         ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  0:09           ` Dave Jones
2002-02-12  0:20             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12  0:24               ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020211.185100.68039940.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox