From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
davidm@hpl.hp.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 13:52:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020215135230.A25047@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zippel@linux-m68k.org> <23603.1013777812@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <23603.1013777812@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>; from dhowells@redhat.com on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:56:52PM +0000
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:56:52PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> And then after some discussion:
>
> | In particular, there's been all that discussion about cache-coloring the
> | "struct task_struct", and my personal suggestion for that whole can of
> | worms is to have the "struct low_level" be in the one low cache-line, and
> | make it contain a pointer to "struct task_struct" - and just split the two
> | up completely. Then the low-level asm code would never have to even look
> | at "task_struct", it would only look at this stuff.
>
> (struct low_level became thread_info).
I see. Yes, that makes sense. My mistake was following davem's
lead and pulling everything out of struct thread_struct. In
reality, I shouldn't have moved hardly anything and $8 should
still point to current.
r~
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-15 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-14 15:26 [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch David Howells
2002-02-14 16:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-14 16:32 ` David Howells
2002-02-14 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-14 17:03 ` David Howells
2002-02-14 20:48 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-14 23:53 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-15 9:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 10:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 11:25 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 11:37 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 12:20 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 12:56 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 13:49 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 13:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 14:22 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 14:07 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 14:28 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 21:56 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-15 21:52 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020215135230.A25047@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox