public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: "Peter Wong" <wpeter@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	marcelo@conectiva.com.br, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Encountered a Null Pointer Problem on the SCSI Layer
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:01:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202182301.AAA23425@webserver.ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFC7A42817.7DD2C3FB-ON85256B64.00725D00@raleigh.ibm.com>

> A while ago, I reported that I encountered a null pointer problem   
> on the SCSI layer when I was testing Mingming Cao's diskio patch    
> "diskio-stat-rq-2414" on 2.4.14.                                    
>                                                                     
> Mingming's patch is at http://sourceforge.net/projects/lse/.        
>                                                                     
> The code in sd_find_queue() that protects against accessing a       
> non-existent device is not correct. After my patch was sent out,    
> Pete Zaitcev of Red Hat identified a similar problem in             
> sd_init_command of the same file.                                   
>                                                                     
>      Let's consider sd_find_queue().                                
>                                                                     
>      If the array pointed by rscsi_disk has been allocated,         
> dpnt cannot be null.                                                
>                                                                     
>      If rscsi_disk has NOT been allocated, dpnt =                   
&rscsi_disks[target]                                                  
> may NOT be null, and it depends on the value of target. Thus,       
> "if (!dpnt)" is not sufficient anyway.                              
>                                                                     
>      You can also look at sd_attach(), in which "if (!dpnt->device)"
is                                                                    
> tested, not "if (!dpnt)".                                           
>                                                                     
>      Please check.                                                  
                                                                      
Are you 100% sure, that there is no case where                        
dpnt==NULL? Because if there is such a possibility, your patch will   
blow up.                                                              
It would be completely safe to check both                             
                                                                      
(!dpnt && !dpnt->device)                                              
                                                                      
Regards,                                                              
Stephan                                                               
                                                                      
                                                                      
>                                                                     
> The following patch is based on the 2.4.18-pre7 code:               
>                                                                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----                                                                 
> --- linux/drivers/scsi/sd.c   Mon Feb 18 13:36:42 2002              
> +++ linux-2.4.17-diskio/drivers/scsi/sd.c Mon Feb 18 13:29:34 2002  
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@                                                 
>       target = DEVICE_NR(dev);                                      
>                                                                     
>       dpnt = &rscsi_disks[target];                                  
> -     if (!dpnt)                                                    
> +     if (!dpnt->device)                                            
>             return NULL;      /* No such device */                  
>       return &dpnt->device->request_queue;                          
>  }                                                                  
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@                                                 
>                                                                     
>       dpnt = &rscsi_disks[dev];                                     
>       if (devm >= (sd_template.dev_max << 4) ||                     
> -         !dpnt ||                                                  
> +         !dpnt->device ||                                          
>           !dpnt->device->online ||                                  
>           block + SCpnt->request.nr_sectors > sd[devm].nr_sects) {  
>             SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(2, printk("Finishing %ld sectors\n",   
SCpnt->request.nr_sectors));                                          
>                                                                     
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----                                                                 
>                                                                     
> Regards,                                                            
> Peter                                                               
>                                                                     
> Wai Yee Peter Wong                                                  
> IBM Linux Technology Center, Performance Analysis                   
> email: wpeter@us.ibm.com                                            
>                                                                     
> -                                                                   
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe           
linux-kernel" in                                                      
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org                  
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html  
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/                    
>                                                                     

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-18 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-18 21:03 [PATCH] Encountered a Null Pointer Problem on the SCSI Layer Peter Wong
2002-02-18 23:01 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2002-02-19  0:04   ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-02-19 11:55     ` Stephan von Krawczynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200202182301.AAA23425@webserver.ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=wpeter@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox