From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:23:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:23:33 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:32779 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:23:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:23:12 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Pavel Machek Cc: Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Whitespace PCI cleanups Message-ID: <20020219142312.B8293@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Pavel Machek , Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020218181623.GA122@elf.ucw.cz> <20020219102752.7dd1e21c.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20020219090721.GB8851@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020219090721.GB8851@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>; from pavel@suse.cz on Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:07:21AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:07:21AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > I did not want to give it to *two* maintainers for tracking, because > you might potentially stomp on each other. I don't think thats an issue. Even if Rusty and myself both send the same small bits to Linus, it doubles the chances of him not dropping the patch for no reason. Whilst I'm chainsawing up some of the bigger bits, if the smaller bits go to Linus through Rusty, that makes everyones life easier. Having both of us pick up small bits isn't so much duplicating work, its an extra safety net of sorts. If I overlook something, maybe Rusty will pick it up, and vice versa. Hopefully Rusty will get a good acceptance on small bits before he ends up with a huge collection 8-) -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs