From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jmerkey@timpanogas.org
Subject: Re: ioremap()/PCI sickness in 2.4.18-rc2 (FIXED ALMOST)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:10:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020220151053.A1198@vger.timpanogas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020220103320.A32211@vger.timpanogas.org> <20020220103539.B32211@vger.timpanogas.org> <3C73DC34.E83CCD35@mandrakesoft.com> <20020220.093034.112623671.davem@redhat.com> <20020220110004.A32431@vger.timpanogas.org> <20020220145449.A1102@vger.timpanogas.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020220145449.A1102@vger.timpanogas.org>; from jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 02:54:49PM -0700
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 02:54:49PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> struct vm_struct * get_vm_area(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags)
> {
> unsigned long addr;
> struct vm_struct **p, *tmp, *area;
>
> area = (struct vm_struct *) kmalloc(sizeof(*area), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!area)
> return NULL;
> size += PAGE_SIZE;
> addr = VMALLOC_START;
> write_lock(&vmlist_lock);
> for (p = &vmlist; (tmp = *p) ; p = &tmp->next) {
>
> ===============> we barf here since the size + addr wraps
>
Also, this function should be moved to the /arch/i386/mm area since
it is doing pointer arithmetic with 32 bit assumptions (i.e.
unsigned long + unsigned long) Last time I checked, unsigned long
was a construct for a 32 bit value in any gcc compiler version, ia64
or not.
Jeff
> if ((size + addr) < addr)
> goto out;
>
> if (size + addr <= (unsigned long) tmp->addr)
> break;
> addr = tmp->size + (unsigned long) tmp->addr;
> if (addr > VMALLOC_END-size)
> goto out;
> }
> area->flags = flags;
> area->addr = (void *)addr;
> area->size = size;
> area->next = *p;
> *p = area;
> write_unlock(&vmlist_lock);
> return area;
>
> out:
> write_unlock(&vmlist_lock);
> kfree(area);
> return NULL;
> }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:00:04AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> >
> > David,
> >
> > Someone had a thought that perhaps the Serverworks chipset is mapping
> > addresses above the 4GB boundry. Any thoughts on how to get around
> > this problem?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:30:34AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > > From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 12:26:12 -0500
> > >
> > > type abuse aside, and alpha bugs aside, this looks ok... what is the
> > > value of as->msize?
> > >
> > > Jeff and Jeff, the problem is one of two things:
> > >
> > > 1) when you have ~2GB of memory the vmalloc pool is very small
> > > and this it the same place ioremap allocations come from
> > >
> > > 2) the BIOS or Linus is not assigning resources of the device
> > > properly, or it simple can't because the available PCI MEM space
> > > with this much memory is too small
> > >
> > > I note that one of the resources of the card is 16MB or so.
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-20 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-20 17:33 ioremap()/PCI sickness in 2.4.18-rc2 Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 17:35 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 17:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-20 17:30 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-20 18:00 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 21:54 ` ioremap()/PCI sickness in 2.4.18-rc2 (FIXED ALMOST) Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 21:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-20 22:20 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 22:53 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-20 23:35 ` Jeff V. Merkey
[not found] ` <mailman.1014247349.21244.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-02-20 23:44 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-02-20 22:10 ` Jeff V. Merkey [this message]
2002-02-20 22:08 ` arjan
2002-02-22 11:08 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-02-22 18:17 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-22 18:42 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-22 18:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-22 19:01 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-22 19:42 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-23 2:22 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-20 18:44 ` ioremap()/PCI sickness in 2.4.18-rc2 Steffen Persvold
2002-02-20 20:36 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-22 11:49 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-02-22 18:21 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2002-02-20 17:46 ` Jeff V. Merkey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020220151053.A1198@vger.timpanogas.org \
--to=jmerkey@vger.timpanogas.org \
--cc=jmerkey@timpanogas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox