public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Lunz <j@trellisinc.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux kernel config converter
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:41:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020221154123.GA6543@trellisinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202210636020.8696-100000@dlang.diginsite.com> <3C750CCF.989B1FDD@mandrakesoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C750CCF.989B1FDD@mandrakesoft.com>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David Lang wrote:
>> I'll argue that _not_ doing this violated the principle of lease surprise,
>> if you turn a feature on and immediatly back off why should anything in
>> your config be any different then it was before you turned it on?
> 
> Imagine this case:
> 
> make xconfig # select CONFIG_USB_HID, which auto-selects CONFIG_INPUT
> { time passes }
> make xconfig # de-select CONFIG_USB_HID
> 
> On the second 'make xconfig', should CONFIG_INPUT be automatically
> de-selected?  No.  Because that is making the assumption that the person
> does not want to continue to make the input API available.

It depends. When CONFIG_USB_HID auto-selected CONFIG_INPUT, did the user
know about it? Or did it just happen automagically behind the scenes? If
it was turned on silently, and the subsequent de-select of
CONFIG_USB_HID silently left CONFIG_INPUT turned on, I'd say that
violates least-surprise.

On the other hand, if turning on CONFIG_USB_HID then prompts "to do
that, I also have to turn on CONFIG_INPUT", i suppose it's ok to leave
CONFIG_INPUT turned on later.

-- 
Jason Lunz		Trellis Network Security
j@trellisinc.com	http://www.trellisinc.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-21 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-21 10:48 linux kernel config converter Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 11:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 12:21   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 12:32     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 12:54 ` Erik Andersen
2002-02-21 13:21   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 14:28     ` David Lang
2002-02-21 14:36       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 14:40         ` David Lang
2002-02-21 15:05           ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 15:41             ` Jason Lunz [this message]
2002-02-21 15:54               ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 15:18         ` Alan Cox
2002-02-21 15:08           ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 15:22             ` Gerd Knorr
2002-02-21 15:33       ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 18:53     ` Andreas Dilger
     [not found] <fa.gq2s5iv.1s4in@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-21 13:28 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 14:11   ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 14:32     ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 15:19       ` Roman Zippel
     [not found] <fa.fsgrt4v.1bngh9t@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.hp69onv.i7qtq3@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-21 14:06   ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 14:26     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 14:39       ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 15:11         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 16:00       ` Randy.Dunlap
     [not found]   ` <fa.lqt3hav.190o1i9@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-21 14:50     ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 14:56       ` David Lang
2002-02-21 15:05         ` Giacomo Catenazzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020221154123.GA6543@trellisinc.com \
    --to=j@trellisinc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox