From: Jason Lunz <j@trellisinc.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux kernel config converter
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:41:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020221154123.GA6543@trellisinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202210636020.8696-100000@dlang.diginsite.com> <3C750CCF.989B1FDD@mandrakesoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C750CCF.989B1FDD@mandrakesoft.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> David Lang wrote:
>> I'll argue that _not_ doing this violated the principle of lease surprise,
>> if you turn a feature on and immediatly back off why should anything in
>> your config be any different then it was before you turned it on?
>
> Imagine this case:
>
> make xconfig # select CONFIG_USB_HID, which auto-selects CONFIG_INPUT
> { time passes }
> make xconfig # de-select CONFIG_USB_HID
>
> On the second 'make xconfig', should CONFIG_INPUT be automatically
> de-selected? No. Because that is making the assumption that the person
> does not want to continue to make the input API available.
It depends. When CONFIG_USB_HID auto-selected CONFIG_INPUT, did the user
know about it? Or did it just happen automagically behind the scenes? If
it was turned on silently, and the subsequent de-select of
CONFIG_USB_HID silently left CONFIG_INPUT turned on, I'd say that
violates least-surprise.
On the other hand, if turning on CONFIG_USB_HID then prompts "to do
that, I also have to turn on CONFIG_INPUT", i suppose it's ok to leave
CONFIG_INPUT turned on later.
--
Jason Lunz Trellis Network Security
j@trellisinc.com http://www.trellisinc.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-21 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-21 10:48 linux kernel config converter Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 11:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 12:21 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 12:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 12:54 ` Erik Andersen
2002-02-21 13:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 14:28 ` David Lang
2002-02-21 14:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 14:40 ` David Lang
2002-02-21 15:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 15:41 ` Jason Lunz [this message]
2002-02-21 15:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 15:18 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-21 15:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 15:22 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-02-21 15:33 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 18:53 ` Andreas Dilger
[not found] <fa.gq2s5iv.1s4in@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-21 13:28 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 14:11 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-21 14:32 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 15:19 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] <fa.fsgrt4v.1bngh9t@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.hp69onv.i7qtq3@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-21 14:06 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 14:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 14:39 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 15:11 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-21 16:00 ` Randy.Dunlap
[not found] ` <fa.lqt3hav.190o1i9@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-21 14:50 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2002-02-21 14:56 ` David Lang
2002-02-21 15:05 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020221154123.GA6543@trellisinc.com \
--to=j@trellisinc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox