Re: Flash Back -- kernel 2.1.111

Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-24T07:33:39Z

> Martin not only had "cleanup" in the subject line, but actually explained
> all the changes, including the timing change. The comments at the top of
> the patch mail said (on that particular change, which seems to have been
> your favourite target), typos and all:
>
> 3. Replace the functionally totally equal system_bus_block() and
> ide_system_bus_speed() functions with one simple global
> variable: system_bus_speed. This saves quite a significatn amount of
> code. Unfortunately this is the part, which is makeing this
> patch to appear bigger then it really is...

Ummm, how does this work if I have two PCI ide cards, one on a 66mhz PCI
bus, and one on a 33mhz PCI bus?

Or am I missing something?

--
Troy Benjegerdes | master of mispeeling | 'da hozer' | hozer@drgw.net
-----"If this message isn't misspelled, I didn't write it" -- Me -----
"Why do musicians compose symphonies and poets write poems? They do it
because life wouldn't have any meaning for them if they didn't. That's
why I draw cartoons. It's my life." -- Charles Schulz