From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: S W <egberts@yahoo.com>, Andrew Hatfield <lkml@secureone.com.au>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
techsupport@itexinc.com
Subject: Re: Dlink DSL PCI Card
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:36:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020222113600.F14673@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020220185044.31163.qmail@web10502.mail.yahoo.com> <E16dcnl-0004Wd-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E16dcnl-0004Wd-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:53:17PM +0000
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 07:53:17PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > that have microcodes loaded to them NOR require
> > proprietary microcodes accessed to memory by DMA. In
> > other word, don't buy winmodem nor DSL PCI adapters,
> > until those chipset manufacturers publish those
> > datasheets.
>
> The same reasoning goes for another reason. Some of the newest DSL PCI cards are
> in many respects winmodems at multimegabit speed levels, burning huge chunks
> of CPU on a pentium III processor even.
I did some digging on the chipset used by the dlink card, and its made by the
folks at http://www.itexinc.com/ . They claim Linux support, but only in the
form of an infrequently updated binary only module that is only available
through OEMs. Unfortunately, they're uncooperative in providing documentation
for writing an open source driver. It would be Really Nice if the guidelines
on the use of the Linux trademark prevented claims of Linux support without
driver source (ie, forcing binary only module drivers to be marketed as
"partial Linux support through kernel specific binary modules").
-ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-22 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-20 0:36 Dlink DSL PCI Card Andrew Hatfield
2002-02-20 1:57 ` Andrew Hatfield
2002-02-20 18:50 ` S W
2002-02-20 19:53 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-20 20:14 ` S W
2002-02-22 16:36 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2002-02-22 17:19 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-22 22:33 Dave Rattay [ITeX]
2002-02-22 22:49 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-02-23 0:00 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-02-22 23:15 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-02-22 23:00 Dave Rattay [ITeX]
2002-02-22 23:27 Dave Rattay [ITeX]
2002-02-22 23:39 ` Erik Andersen
2002-02-23 12:42 ` Mark H. Wood
2002-02-23 13:10 Per Jessen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020222113600.F14673@redhat.com \
--to=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=egberts@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@secureone.com.au \
--cc=techsupport@itexinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox