From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Luigi Genoni <kernel@Expansa.sns.it>
Cc: "Paul G. Allen" <pgallen@randomlogic.com>,
"Linux kernel developer's mailing list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 02:48:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020225024817.Q2434@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C775FEF.BDA0253C@randomlogic.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202250100540.15348-100000@Expansa.sns.it>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202250100540.15348-100000@Expansa.sns.it>; from kernel@Expansa.sns.it on Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:07:42AM +0100
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:07:42AM +0100, Luigi Genoni wrote:
> At this link:
>
> http://www.cs.utk.edu/~rwhaley/ATLAS/gcc30.html
>
> you can find an interesting explanation why code compiled with gcc 3.0 is
> mostly slower than code compiled with gcc 2.95 on x86 CPUs (but it is
> really faster on other platforms like alpha and sparc64).
>
> basically the main reasons semm to be the scheduler algorithm and the fpu
> stack handling, but I suggest to read the full study.
>
>
> I would be interested to know if this apply to gcc 3.1 too.
Well, concerning reg-stack, you can completely get away without it in 3.1
by using -mfpmath=sse if you are targeting Pentium 3,4 or Athlon 4,xp,mp
(for float math, for higher precision only for Pentium 4).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-23 4:40 gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 Justin Piszcz
2002-02-23 4:44 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-23 5:13 ` Justin Piszcz
2002-02-23 5:22 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 5:50 ` Richard Gooch
2002-02-23 10:31 ` Benny Sjostrand
2002-02-23 15:00 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-25 8:07 ` Simon Kirby
2002-02-25 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-02-25 8:32 ` David Rees
2002-02-25 9:32 ` Ian Castle
2002-02-25 9:52 ` Markus Schaber
2002-02-23 5:40 ` hugang
2002-02-23 5:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 9:25 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-02-23 13:55 ` gmack
2002-02-23 15:43 ` bert hubert
2002-02-25 0:07 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-25 0:32 ` ANN: syscalltrack v0.7 released guy keren
2002-02-25 7:48 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2002-02-25 9:46 ` gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4 Luigi Genoni
2002-02-25 9:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-02-25 12:55 ` Jan Hubicka
2002-02-25 16:08 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020225024817.Q2434@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@Expansa.sns.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgallen@randomlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox