From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext3 and undeletion
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:38:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020226173822.GN4393@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020226171634.GL4393@matchmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0202261419240.1413-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0202261419240.1413-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 02:22:31PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:07:49PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> > > >>For the educated user it was always a pain
> > > >>in the you know where, to constantly run out of quota space due to
> > > >>file versioning.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >Ahh, so we'd need to chown the files to root (or a configurable user and
> > > >group) to get around the quota issue.
> > >
> > > Welcome to my kill-file. This just shows that you don't even have basic
> > > background.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Now, if I'm talking out of my ass, can someone sane say so?
>
> Your idea should work on deletion, when the inode were
> about to be destroyed, but ...
>
> > It would only call chown/chgrp on the files *inside* the undelete dir,
> > and user,group,etc would have to be accounted for in another way. Am I
> > going in the wrong direction?
>
> ... of course, there still is the problem of hard links.
>
I had considered hard links. Take a look at my another message from me in
this thread and see Daniel's response to it.
Basically, it would only move the files to the undelete area if the link
count == 1. If you just decremented the link, then unlink() in glibc would
work as it does now.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.n4lfl6v.h4chor@ifi.uio.no>
2002-02-25 17:06 ` ext3 and undeletion Dan Maas
2002-02-25 17:20 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-25 23:33 ` Tom Rauschenbach
2002-02-26 0:27 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-02-26 5:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 16:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 16:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 17:12 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 16:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:54 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 17:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 17:07 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 17:16 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 17:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 17:38 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2002-02-26 18:14 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-02-26 18:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 22:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 18:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-26 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 18:47 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-26 18:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-28 15:05 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-02-28 22:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-28 22:55 ` James D Strandboge
2002-03-01 4:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 16:26 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 21:29 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-06 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 22:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-26 17:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-01 0:19 ` Rick Lindsley
2002-03-01 1:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 17:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 18:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-04 15:40 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-25 18:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-25 18:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-25 19:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-25 22:05 ` ext3 and undeletion (libtrash) Omen Wild
2002-03-05 23:04 ext3 and undeletion Rose, Billy
2002-03-06 20:03 ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-07 21:30 ` Patrick Lynch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-28 10:37 Randal, Phil
2002-02-26 18:39 Dana Lacoste
2002-02-26 18:47 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2002-02-26 18:51 ` David Lang
2002-02-26 17:48 Rose, Billy
2002-02-26 17:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-26 18:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 17:56 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 19:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 18:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 18:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 18:23 ` Jakob Østergaard
2002-02-26 18:19 ` David Lang
2002-02-26 18:29 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-02-27 21:00 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-27 21:40 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-27 22:16 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-27 22:33 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-27 23:03 ` James D Strandboge
2002-02-28 0:29 ` James D Strandboge
2002-03-04 2:17 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 15:12 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-04 15:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 19:17 ` James D Strandboge
2002-03-04 20:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-03-02 17:36 ` Pablo Alcaraz
2002-02-25 16:46 Rose, Billy
2002-02-25 3:27 Steven Walter
2002-02-25 5:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-25 10:16 ` Fabrice Bellet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020226173822.GN4393@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox