public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>,
	"Dennis, Jim" <jdennis@snapserver.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Congrats Marcelo,
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:00:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020227000024.G6197@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B153AD4@cdserv.meridian-data.com> <20020226140644.U12832@lynx.adilger.int> <1014760581.5993.159.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <1014760581.5993.159.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on mar, feb 26, 2002 at 22:56:21 +0100


On 20020226 Steve Lord wrote:
>On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 15:06, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 2002  12:38 -0800, Dennis, Jim wrote:
>> >  Now I need to know about the status of several unofficial patches:
>> 
>> While my word is by no means official, my general understanding is:
>> 
>> > 	XFS
>> 
>> Not for 2.4 - just too many changes to the core kernel code.
>
>Someone has got to kill this assumption people have about XFS, it
>makes much smaller changes than some things which have gone in,
>the odd VM rewrite here and there to name some. Given that we now
>have official EA system calls, the last chunk of stuff to resolve
>is quota. This is being worked on with Jan Kara.
>

AFAIK, it does not so many changes but duplicates half the fs 
infrastructure already present in kernel just to have a common
codebase with IRIX.

Is this still true ?
Is anybody working in kill all the dups ?
 
-- 
J.A. Magallon                           #  Let the source be with you...        
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.18-jam1 #1 SMP Tue Feb 26 00:06:55 CET 2002 i686

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 20:38 Congrats Marcelo, Dennis, Jim
2002-02-26 20:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 21:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 21:15   ` crypto (was Re: Congrats Marcelo,) Jeff Garzik
2002-02-26 21:35     ` Robert Love
2002-02-26 21:40       ` arjan
2002-02-26 21:47         ` Robert Love
2002-02-24 23:51           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-28 22:32             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01  9:50               ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-27  9:41       ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-26 22:33     ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 21:15       ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 21:57         ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 22:29           ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 23:06             ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 21:56   ` Congrats Marcelo, Steve Lord
2002-02-24 23:39     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:07       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:10         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:23       ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-25  0:38         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:59         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  0:47           ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-27  1:03             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  1:08             ` Matthew D. Pitts
2002-02-26 22:59     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 22:59       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:28         ` Whither XFS? (was: Congrats Marcelo) Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:39           ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  8:22             ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:00     ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2002-02-28 21:52 ` Congrats Marcelo, Marcelo Tosatti
2002-03-01  0:01   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  0:37     ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:13       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:03         ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:51           ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:28     ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-01  1:53       ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02 22:35         ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-03-02  3:43   ` Stephen Degler
2002-02-28 22:41 ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-01  9:30 Andries.Brouwer
2002-03-01 18:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02  4:13 Dennis, Jim
2002-03-02 18:24 ` David Ford
2002-03-03 22:58 ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020227000024.G6197@werewolf.able.es \
    --to=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=jdennis@snapserver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox